pull down to refresh

Possibly there is some CCP internal rift here.

Maybe it's like when in the U.S. a President might have some ability to cut off Federal funding for a specific state, using a "legit" justification but underneath the real reasons might to punish the leaders of that state for their opposition or for some other reason.

I don't know shit about fuck but maybe it is something like Beijing wanted to nail Shanghai leaders for something but their actions against them might not work politically, so instead they lock down the city for "zero covid", forcing economic harm on those they wanted to harm (e.g., large property owners whose tenants will now not be able to afford to pay rent).

The State Department said the order is an upgrade from the “authorized” departure issued last week that made the decision voluntary.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-orders-consular-to-leave-shanghai-amid-covid-outbreak/ar-AAW7bvx?ocid=ob-tw-enus-1541511688107

reply
Shanghai is the rebellious city. So what do you do? Use “Covid” to “shut them up”- literally & figuratively.
view on twitter.com
reply

There are no coincidences.

Shanghai accounted for 29% of yuan trading by banks for their clients in February, more than any other region in China.

Yuan Trading Dries Up As Shanghai Lockdown Drags On
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/yuan-trading-dries-shanghai-lockdown-drags

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author