Shrodinger's closed-source non-custodial wallet.
If the wallet is closed-source, you can't know if it's non-custodial or custodial. You must therefore assume it is both.
https://twitter.com/francispouliot_/status/1665426028750069763 [Nitter]
And the replies:
You must assume it is custodial since for all intents and purposes it is.Even open-source non-custodial wallets that are not deterministically verifiable are effectively closed-source and thus, custodial.
https://twitter.com/JuanSGalt/status/1665444944683626497 [Nitter]
That's why @WalletScrutiny is so important. Even though their standards are high, they are nevertheless the bare minimum.
https://twitter.com/JuanSGalt/status/1665451277063536644 [Nitter]
Wallet Scrutiny: https://walletscrutiny.com
https://postimg.cc/4KHcmmCH
Too much noise around this obscure "service". What about https://bitcoinbinary.org/ ? What about who scrutinize the scrutinizers?
I don't consider a "must use" this walletscrutinity. They do a lot of shitcoining to have a red flag about their "services".
I go for more simple rules when I choose a wallet.
But people today are retarded. They just follow " influencers" like NPCs.
https://twitter.com/hazae41/status/1665430476755025922 [Nitter