pull down to refresh

9 sats \ 5 replies \ @cointastical 3 Apr 2022 \ parent \ on: Impervious Browser Live Demo - HD 1080p bitcoin
But, of course, none of that really matters, if this is ends up becoming true:
Incorrect, open source on release.
write
preview
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @kevkevin 3 Apr 2022
Does this mean open source like MIT or open source like Umbrel?
reply
13 sats \ 3 replies \ @ugmug 3 Apr 2022
Like Umbrel, it's not FOSS.
reply
11 sats \ 2 replies \ @kevkevin 3 Apr 2022
well that's no bueno
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @shyfire 3 Apr 2022
Why do you say that? Do you intend on actually modifying the source code?
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @ugmug 4 Apr 2022
It doesn't matter if he does or doesn't. FOSS is core to the ethos of Bitcoin. Anyone should be free to do whatever they want with the software, even if that means they can build their own business from it.
The best analogy I've come up with is relating it to censoring transactions. Even if you knew your transactions wouldn't be censored, you wouldn't be okay with a miner that chose to censor other's transactions.
So even if you wouldn't modify the code yourself, you shouldn't be okay with having the freedom of others bring limited from doing so who could.
reply