pull down to refresh
related posts
233 sats \ 2 replies \ @ssaurel 10 Mar 2023
Just seeing Meta and the term "decentralized" in the same sentence made me think it was April 1st...
Meta just wants to ride the wave of decentralization, but in the end, no doubt Mark Zuckerberg's only interest is to centralize everything he can to generate more and more profits from his users' data.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sebastix OP 10 Mar 2023
I totally agree with you.
Meta (and other bigtech) will just copy-cat this trend with their own terms&conditions to exploit their users even more.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 10 Mar 2023
Exactly. Facebook decentralization is an oxymoron
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sebastix OP 10 Mar 2023
Another source about this project with codename P92:
https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/startup/meta-mulls-a-twitter-competitor-codenamed-p92-that-will-be-interoperable-with-mastodon-10223961.html
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 10 Mar 2023
They’ve spent billions on VR and got minimal traction. I doubt they’ll do much better with decentralized social media
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 10 Mar 2023
Day late and a dollar short, as people used to say
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 10 Mar 2023
Full disclosure, I did not read the article. But why would they be interested in a decentralized social network? Centralization is very important to them. Unless they’re looking to offload infrastructure costs, or everyone’s favorite, they say decentralized but they don’t really mean it.
reply