pull down to refresh

44 sats \ 11 replies \ @siggy47 4 Apr \ parent \ on: Reminder - anti Iran war posts on Stacker.news are getting heavily downzapped meta

You think it's Todd? Maybe. If so, all of us combined couldn't stop him from controlling the feed with his stack.

write
compose
100 sats \ 10 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Apr

@0xbitcoiner did some sleuthing and worked that out

reply
100 sats \ 9 replies \ @siggy47 4 Apr

I don't know. I think he would be more upfront about it. He would enjoy pissing everyone off. Also, if we're invisible, who can he argue with?

reply
103 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 22h

The 'new' filter + wildwest mode is the way, there's no moderation there! Sats war gets you nowhere. Poorly spent sats! But it's all good with me 🤠 ~lol

reply
33 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 21h

I actually get some enjoyment out of making censorship more expensive.

reply
68 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 20h

I understand, but SN is so small that I'm not sure if we can talk about censorship, can we?

reply
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 19h

It depends on whether the rumors are true about who he works for.

Generally, though, I enjoy making it more costly for those seeking to suppress information.

reply
79 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Apr

Well, at the same time that one post was downzapped 5k, he was the only one who had spent 5k.

reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @Signal312 OP 5 Apr

Good sleuthing!

reply
61 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 4 Apr

Pretty good evidence. Perhaps some government alphabet agency hijacked his account.

reply
73 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 4 Apr

Or, perhaps they don't have to

reply
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 4 Apr

I wasn't going to go there.

reply