pull down to refresh

12 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 3 Apr \ parent \ on: Reminder - anti Iran war posts on Stacker.news are getting heavily downzapped meta

Why should someone else's upzaps influence post visibility for you?

write
compose
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 4 Apr

@k00b can you confirm whether downzaps have diminishing returns like upzaps?

reply
67 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 4 Apr

Neither have diminishing returns.

1 sat = 1 sat regardless of:

  1. the person spending it
  2. the number of sats the person (or anyone else) has already spent
reply
48 sats \ 1 reply \ @Signal312 OP 4 Apr

I think it would be cool to be able to SUBSCRIBE to people's downzaps.

i.e. - if someone downzaps, have it show up in your notifications.

(someone in particular, not every downzap)

?

reply
35 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Apr

That could sort of happen mechanically if trust-based feeds were reintroduced and you developed negative trust with someone else.

reply
68 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 3 Apr

They shouldn't, necessarily.

reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 3 Apr

I do prefer the personalized feed based on bilateral trust, at least conceptually.

Still, absent other information, upzaps - downzaps will be a decent signal of quality if your preferences align with those of the zappers.

reply