0 sats \ 5 replies \ @TheBTCManual 2 Mar 2023
Still think that people are going to bugger it up and we'll see many people moving sats around not having a clue an inscription is attached to it
reply
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @chytrik 2 Mar 2023
Things could truly get messy in that regard. Imagine accidentally sending an ordinal to a wallet that is not ordinal-aware, as part of a payment. Even if you could convince the owner of that wallet to send it back, there is a reasonable chance that the recipient's wallet won't have the coin-control functions needed to ensure the right UTXO is returned. Yikes, lol.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 2 Mar 2023
Lol exactly it's going to be quite the balls up, and not to mention if that sat somehow gets moved into an LN channel and its pinging around. I am pretty sure we will have plenty of ordinal horror stories, because its a hack job set up, people couldn't even handle tokens in a centralised database like eth and solana, how are they going to handle this?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 2 Mar 2023
people are retarded
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TheBTCManual 2 Mar 2023
Lol that's where the yield comes from
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 2 Mar 2023
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
reply