pull down to refresh

3 sats \ 10 replies \ @k00b 8h \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon

4:5 CCs to sats for zaps over the last month.

write
preview
124 sats \ 8 replies \ @SimpleStacker 8h

What about for those with attached receiving wallets?

reply
68 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 8h

3:5 CCs to sats

reply
1 sat \ 5 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 7h

What about for those with attached receiving and sending wallets?

reply
1 sat \ 4 replies \ @k00b 7h

5:9

reply
1 sat \ 3 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 7h

And those with no attached wallets?

Like @Darthcoin

reply
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @k00b 7h

... 1:0

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 7h

Of course, they cannot receive or send sats, ever.
That's you @DarthCoin ... 'living on The Bitcoin Standard' - what a hero.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 6h

deleted by author

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 6h

So all these figures are for the zaps received by stackers?

Can you provide figures for zaps sent by stackers?

Presumably they would be zero % sats (and 100% CCs) sent by anyone without a sending wallet?

reply
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 7h -100 sats

Already over 40% debasement of the SNs monetary system.
Great Bitcoiner Solidarity Yeah Right!
CCs printer goes Brrrrr

Driven by those who never send sats because they do not attach sending wallet.
They only attach a receiving wallet so they can extract real money but never spend it on SNs.
They do not want to show their SNs wallet history.

Concealing LN wallet status just hastens the CCs debasement of SNs economy

Thanks to all the 'Bitcoiners', talking Big about 'living on The Bitcoin Standard' who cant be fucked actually using Bitcoin but prefer CCs because CCs 'always work'.