pull down to refresh
4:5 CCs to sats for zaps over the last month.
What about for those with attached receiving wallets?
What about for those with attached receiving and sending wallets?
And those with no attached wallets?
Like @Darthcoin
Of course, they cannot receive or send sats, ever.
That's you @DarthCoin ... 'living on The Bitcoin Standard' - what a hero.
deleted by author
So all these figures are for the zaps received by stackers?
Can you provide figures for zaps sent by stackers?
Presumably they would be zero % sats (and 100% CCs) sent by anyone without a sending wallet?
Already over 40% debasement of the SNs monetary system.
Great Bitcoiner Solidarity Yeah Right!
CCs printer goes Brrrrr
Driven by those who never send sats because they do not attach sending wallet.
They only attach a receiving wallet so they can extract real money but never spend it on SNs.
They do not want to show their SNs wallet history.
Concealing LN wallet status just hastens the CCs debasement of SNs economy
Thanks to all the 'Bitcoiners', talking Big about 'living on The Bitcoin Standard' who cant be fucked actually using Bitcoin but prefer CCs because CCs 'always work'.
Not sure there's an easy way to do it, but on any post you can see the distribution of sats vs. CC's. And for most posts, sats outweigh CCs by a lot.
The ratio of 4:5 CC to sats given by @koob above shows they are already roughly equal.
And since only stackers with attached sending wallets can send sats how long before the ratio is over taken by CCs?
Now that stackers wallet status is by default concealed it seems any effort there once was to encourage use of sats has been surrendered.
What, is the ratio of CC (inhouse tokens) vs sats (real money) in circulation in the SNs economy these days?
Is there any way of keeping track of the SNs sats vs CCs ratio?
Or maybe it's a secret we are not allowed to know?
@koob