pull down to refresh

20 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 3h \ parent \ on: storing a 66kB continguous image in a Bitcoin tx without OP-RETURN or Taproot lol bitcoin

I'm not advocating for BIP110. Do you have a better solution?

trivialities of no real consequence.

A retarded dismissal of real engineering concerns.

#1441937
#375096

write
preview
146 sats \ 0 replies \ @Taj 54m

Even a beginner like me can see it breaks more than it fixes

this data is bad, this data is good? Seriously?

What else are they going to deem allowed on Bitcoin ?

Retards

reply
44 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 2h

maliciously crafted non-Segwit transactions that are very expensive to validate might be an even better example of a dangerous transaction...and yet you don't see the BIP 54 promoters running around like maniacs trying to strong-arm everyone into a rushed fork. Perhaps BIP 110 could learn something from their approach.

I don't believe ordinals are a real engineering problem for Bitcoin, nor do I believe a solution is warranted. i've been using bitcoin all this time perfectly fine.

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 3h
#1441937

Unless you wanna do a nice lil 3 year rollback, we have to solve that issue outside of BIP-110. BIP-110 doesn't address it.

reply