pull down to refresh

144 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby OP 3h \ parent \ on: storing a 66kB continguous image in a Bitcoin tx without OP-RETURN or Taproot lol bitcoin

Luckily, BIP 110 is such a bad idea, even a retard like me can tell.

The argument is not "Bitcoin is invincible or it deserves to die." The argument is that the things BIP 110 supporters are hyperventilating about are trivialities of no real consequence.

There is nothing that is "official" or "normalized" in Bitcoin, there is just what is possible. Pretending that you have some control over how Bitcoin is used is laughable.

write
preview
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 3h

I'm not advocating for BIP110. Do you have a better solution?

trivialities of no real consequence.

A retarded dismissal of real engineering concerns.

#1441937
#375096

reply
146 sats \ 0 replies \ @Taj 54m

Even a beginner like me can see it breaks more than it fixes

this data is bad, this data is good? Seriously?

What else are they going to deem allowed on Bitcoin ?

Retards

reply
44 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 2h

maliciously crafted non-Segwit transactions that are very expensive to validate might be an even better example of a dangerous transaction...and yet you don't see the BIP 54 promoters running around like maniacs trying to strong-arm everyone into a rushed fork. Perhaps BIP 110 could learn something from their approach.

I don't believe ordinals are a real engineering problem for Bitcoin, nor do I believe a solution is warranted. i've been using bitcoin all this time perfectly fine.

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 3h
#1441937

Unless you wanna do a nice lil 3 year rollback, we have to solve that issue outside of BIP-110. BIP-110 doesn't address it.

reply