I think we all already know the way, even the most controversial among active stackers disagree not upon the core values, but upon relatively minor details when compared to anything Zuck can put into existence versus Bitcoin.

We can disagree about things among us but save for the magnitude of Car beating Bailey up again on a podcast, we're all on this path already.

Scoresby

But I also think this is something Bitcoin (or LN) doesn't fix.

I wish I believed that there was something to gain from step-by-step explaining 

 why this is actually what LN (but not Bitcoin) fixes, as long as we don't have that doom scenario from a few years back of "2 networks, of which one KYC".

Either way, yes you're right. If some platform with a couple 100M MAU will expose a non-compliant means to do monetary transfer, they will be destroyed. We've seen that. Zuck has seen that. So the power is in getting the 100M MAU under the radar. And guess how we do that? One stacker at a time.

econ

Meta plans stablecoin comeback in the second half amid U.S. regulatory shift

> But I also think this is something Bitcoin (or LN) doesn't fix.

I wish I believed that there was something to gain from step-by-step explaining [^1] why this is actually what LN (but not Bitcoin) fixes, as long as we don't have that doom scenario from a few years back of "2 networks, of which one KYC".

Either way, yes you're right. If some platform with a couple 100M MAU will expose a non-compliant means to do monetary transfer, they will be destroyed. We've seen that. Zuck has seen that. So the power is in getting the 100M MAU under the radar. And guess how we do that? One stacker at a time.

[^1]: But I think that that would be putting oil on the fire so for now I will shut up about it. I have found how niche content is now discoverable to the masses with no skill involved, so I don't want to be naive.