If I were a fed, I'd probably make a much more boring site. 😅 Seriously though, the tool is just to help people understand why Legacy addresses are more at risk than SegWit in a post-quantum world. No private keys, no logs.
That’s a fair point, and privacy is exactly why I built this as a client-side focused tool.
I agree that education is key, but for many users, seeing their own 'Public Key Exposed' status makes the risk feel real rather than theoretical. It’s like a 'Have I Been Pwned' for Bitcoin quantum security.
To address the 'fed' concern:
The site doesn't log searches or IPs.
I encourage anyone to use it over Tor/VPN.
I'm working on adding a 'Learn' section that explains the math behind P2PK vs P2PKH so people can verify their status manually if they don't want to type their address.
Thanks for the push—transparency is the only way to build tools in this space
I get the skepticism—the space is full of noise. But let’s stick to the facts:
Zero Risk: Bixoza doesn't ask for private keys, seeds, or any sensitive data. It analyzes public blockchain data. If checking a public address on a website is a "scam," then every block explorer (mempool.space, blockchain.com) is a scam.
The "AI" part: The model I use is for risk simulation and educational visualization, not for "finding keys." It’s about understanding which addresses are P2PK (exposed) vs P2PKH (hashed).
The Goal: Education. Most people don't realize that ~2 million BTC are sitting in quantum-vulnerable outputs. I'd rather people learn about this now than when a CRL (Quantum) actually hits the network.
No Data Retention: Check the Ethics & Legal section on the site. No logs, no IP tracking, no database of queries.
If you have a technical critique of the math or the P2PK exposure theory, I’m all ears. Otherwise, let's keep the discussion constructive
I will tell you something and please keep in mind: the whole quantum thing is a total bullshit lie, to scare the shit out of clueless idiots.
So please give me a break with this crap.
Dismissing cryptography with 'it’s a lie' is a bold strategy. It’s not about fear, it’s about code resilience. Bitcoin was built by people who looked at every possible attack vector, not by people who said 'give me a break' when presented with a technical challenge
nice try fed bot
If I were a fed, I'd probably make a much more boring site. 😅 Seriously though, the tool is just to help people understand why Legacy addresses are more at risk than SegWit in a post-quantum world. No private keys, no logs.
if you were a fed, you'd ask for an address. you can educate folks on addresses without for visitors' addresses.
That’s a fair point, and privacy is exactly why I built this as a client-side focused tool.
I agree that education is key, but for many users, seeing their own 'Public Key Exposed' status makes the risk feel real rather than theoretical. It’s like a 'Have I Been Pwned' for Bitcoin quantum security.
To address the 'fed' concern:
The site doesn't log searches or IPs. I encourage anyone to use it over Tor/VPN. I'm working on adding a 'Learn' section that explains the math behind P2PK vs P2PKH so people can verify their status manually if they don't want to type their address.Thanks for the push—transparency is the only way to build tools in this space
at least you make me laugh today
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
what exactly you want to win with this?
sats from losers that will put their addresses in your scam AI site?
I get the skepticism—the space is full of noise. But let’s stick to the facts:
Zero Risk: Bixoza doesn't ask for private keys, seeds, or any sensitive data. It analyzes public blockchain data. If checking a public address on a website is a "scam," then every block explorer (mempool.space, blockchain.com) is a scam. The "AI" part: The model I use is for risk simulation and educational visualization, not for "finding keys." It’s about understanding which addresses are P2PK (exposed) vs P2PKH (hashed). The Goal: Education. Most people don't realize that ~2 million BTC are sitting in quantum-vulnerable outputs. I'd rather people learn about this now than when a CRL (Quantum) actually hits the network. No Data Retention: Check the Ethics & Legal section on the site. No logs, no IP tracking, no database of queries.If you have a technical critique of the math or the P2PK exposure theory, I’m all ears. Otherwise, let's keep the discussion constructive
I will tell you something and please keep in mind: the whole quantum thing is a total bullshit lie, to scare the shit out of clueless idiots.
So please give me a break with this crap.
Dismissing cryptography with 'it’s a lie' is a bold strategy. It’s not about fear, it’s about code resilience. Bitcoin was built by people who looked at every possible attack vector, not by people who said 'give me a break' when presented with a technical challenge