pull down to refresh
The only signals that should matter are costly signals. Attaching a wallet is free and carries no meaningful information...as is demonstrated by your case.
But SN needs to be a platform that is very difficult to game. The recent downzap storms are a great chance to find out how powerful downzaps are and whether they can be gamed.
Attaching a wallet is free and carries no meaningful information
excellent insight
Edit:
when @optimism raised comment fee to 45, I realized I had almost nothing valuable to say in his territory
The only signals that should matter are costly signals.
That's also how I feel but people are allowed to have whatever preferences they have and are free to put their sats towards those ends. I really don't mind the idea of cultural enforcement through downzaps, we'll see who comes out on top.
Like you say, we need to go through these stress tests to see what we can handle and what can happen here.
Fair point and you may notice my CCP bot algorithms have been adjusted recently to allow for such variables - although, if I can attach both send and receive surely almost anyone can?
coinos works fine 98% of the time.
If we want closer to 100% on LN lets work toward it by using LN . . . or what ? Like @DarthCoin just use CCs 'because they always work'...and leave the LN to die from lack of use...
Inbound liquidity only grows when there is demand for and use of it.
It's particularly funny that he freaked out about my current setup. I zap real sats to everyone who has a receive wallet attached.
The reason I unattached my receive wallet is that my LN channel with Stacker News never had any inbound liquidity and I wanted to see if I could change that.
Your actual point is great and it's what drew me to SN before I had even heard of V4V.