pull down to refresh
yeah, probably. I wasn't paying attention to Strategy then the way I am right now. No idea if this hunch of mine replicates even this year, let alone a few years ago when they were smaller players
I'm sure we can train AI to detect a pattern and money moves in the treasury/institutional MSTR STRC STRF STRK etc. type shares apart from the other biggies like IREN, MARA, and the BlackRock IBIT type funds to figure out what is really going on. Is there a net inflow of BTC into the "system" but a simultaneous net outflow of dollars in the Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) space that is causing the market to dump when it should in fact pump. MSTR became heavily "institutionalized" only mid-2025. Maybe the market is behind oddly ever since, and not previously during 2021-23 purchases when it was just MSTR buying. There is just too much data for us to analyze on our own, but AI can help. AI can read all the 13-F and 13-G filings that the funds are required to make with the SEC in one swoop, but it would take us a week to pore through. Or a seasoned TradFi pro who delves in DATs and has been a long-time bitcoiner.
OK, Chat
The recent price action in Bitcoin (BTC), which saw a "dump" to the $88,000–$90,000 range despite Michael Saylor’s Strategy Inc. (MSTR) adding 13,627 BTC ($1.25 billion) earlier this month, is a classic example of how institutional market mechanics can decouple from simple "supply and demand" logic.
Based on current data from January 2026, here is the "big picture" analysis of why the price dropped while Michael Saylor was buying.
1. The "Hedging" Paradox (MSTR’s ATM Program)1. The "Hedging" Paradox (MSTR’s ATM Program)
Michael Saylor’s latest purchase was funded largely through At-The-Market (ATM) sales of MSTR Class A common stock. This creates a specific downward pressure:
- The Delta-Neutral Hedge: When large institutions buy MSTR stock or convertible debt (which MSTR uses to buy BTC), they often short Bitcoin or sell BTC futures to hedge their exposure. They aren't betting on the price of BTC; they are betting on the "premium" or the arbitrage between MSTR stock and its underlying Bitcoin.
- Net Selling: If the amount of Bitcoin shorted by these institutional "hedgers" exceeds the amount Michael Saylor is physically buying on the spot market, the net result is a price drop.
2. The 13-F and 13-G Signal (The "Exit" of Early Allocators)2. The 13-F and 13-G Signal (The "Exit" of Early Allocators)
The Jan 20, 2026, 13-F filings (covering the period ending Dec 31, 2025) reveal a significant shift in the DAT (Digital Asset Treasury) space:
- Institutional Rotation: While MicroStrategy remains the "leader," several mid-tier institutional players who entered in 2024–2025 appear to be trimming positions. Filings show firms like Harbor Capital and various wealth advisors rebalancing as BTC struggled to hold the $100,000 psychological barrier.
- MSCI Benchmark Pressure: There was significant uncertainty leading up to the Jan 15 MSCI index rebalancing. While Strategy Inc. was ultimately kept in the index, the fear that DATs (companies holding >50% of assets in crypto) would be excluded led to a "sell first, ask questions later" approach by index-tracking funds.
3. ETF "USD Leakage" vs. BTC Inflow3. ETF "USD Leakage" vs. BTC Inflow
Your theory about "USD leaving the system" is supported by the January 16–20 ETF data.
- Massive ETF Outflows: On January 16 alone, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $394.68 million.
- The "System" Dynamic: Michael Saylor adds BTC to his treasury (moving it into a "cold" corporate vault), but at the same time, ETF investors are selling their shares for USD.
- Inflow vs. Outflow: Saylor's $1.25 billion buy was spread over a week (Jan 5–11), whereas the ETF outflows and institutional sell-offs hit the market in a concentrated burst over the last 3–4 days. The "liquidity exit" by ETF holders simply overwhelmed the "supply absorption" by Saylor.
4. Valuation Disconnect (The mNAV Problem)4. Valuation Disconnect (The mNAV Problem)
As of mid-January 2026, Strategy Inc. (MSTR) has been trading at a market-cap-to-NAV (mNAV) of roughly 0.81.
- Meaning: The stock is trading at a 19% discount to the value of the Bitcoin it holds.
- Impact: When the "Bitcoin Proxy" (MSTR) trades at a discount, it signals that the stock market is bearish on Bitcoin’s immediate future. This often acts as a leading indicator, dragging the actual BTC spot price down to meet the stock market's lower valuation.
Big Picture SummaryBig Picture Summary
| Factor | Impact on Price | Logic |
| MSTR Purchase | Neutral/Bearish | Funded by stock sales; leads to institutional hedging (shorting BTC). |
| ETF Flows | Bearish | $394M+ left the "system" in USD over the weekend. |
| 13-F Filings | Bearish | Shows mid-sized funds trimming "year-end" profits. |
| Basis Trade | Neutral | "Cash and Carry" arbitrage is unwinding as yields drop, leading to spot selling. |
The Verdict: BTC is currently being used as a liquidity sponge. Michael Saylor is absorbing supply, but "System USD" is being pulled out by institutional players who are rebalancing their 2026 portfolios and exiting the "proxy" trades (ETFs and MSTR) that reached saturation in late 2025.
Would you like me to look into the specific 13-F filings of the top 5 Bitcoin ETF holders to see which major banks are currently reducing their exposure?
Does the market ALWAYS dump when Strategy buys? I remember in 2021, 2022 and even 2023 it used to go up after MicroStrategy bought.