One (bip110) that continues to attempt more restrictive and complicated soft forks that continually aim towards limiting arbitrary data in Bitcoin transactions...
But this line of reasoning answers itself doesn't it? Who wants to sign up to a Bitcoin that is predicated on frequent contentious soft forks without end?
(If they aren't contentious, who is doing the deciding about how best next to limit transactions to expunge the scourge of spam?)
@dathon_ohmpointed out the repeated requirement of new soft forks. Do you really believe the economic weight of Bitcoin users want to embark on this path?
What if we got two bitcoins out if this?
One (bip110) that continues to attempt more restrictive and complicated soft forks that continually aim towards limiting arbitrary data in Bitcoin transactions...
But this line of reasoning answers itself doesn't it? Who wants to sign up to a Bitcoin that is predicated on frequent contentious soft forks without end?
(If they aren't contentious, who is doing the deciding about how best next to limit transactions to expunge the scourge of spam?)
@dathon_ohm pointed out the repeated requirement of new soft forks. Do you really believe the economic weight of Bitcoin users want to embark on this path?