Who ya got?
LA Lambs
or
Seattle Seagulls
It's a shame they can't both lose but at least one will. (unless it's a tie)
Have you say with sats!
pull down to refresh
40 sats \ 7 replies \ @BlokchainB 13h
Gulls!!
reply
45 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby OP 12h
They will swoop down and steal all the lambs food.
reply
40 sats \ 5 replies \ @BlokchainB 12h
Im all for it
reply
40 sats \ 4 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 12h
I FLOODED THE MARKET WITH RAMS SHARES
#1354757
reply
60 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby OP 12h
I appreciate your donation
reply
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 12h
How much do I get when I win?!
I felt like u guys gave Rams low odds!
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 12h
You essentially paid 67k sats to get 69k sats back if you win. Haha
reply
116 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 12h
Cool so I’m in the clear I’ll get it back!
reply on another page
40 sats \ 5 replies \ @HardMoney 16h
I hope it’s a tie
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby OP 15h
Seems unlikely. Rams probably ok with a tie, but Seahawks know they need the win to have a shot to win the division and get the 1 seed. A tie would help them secure the 5th seed so maybe that interests them as they would get to play whoever wins the South but my guess is if it comes down to it they will push for the win.
reply
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @HardMoney 8h
Let’s go tie
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby OP 8h
Could be.
reply
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @HardMoney 7h
Wild game
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 7h
It was. It looked like the Rams would run away with it until that punt return TD.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @Wumbo 17h
Thanks making market.
NFL, already had one tie this year.
I am curious what season had the most ties.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 17h
There is already a market for who will win the NFC west that is a good way to express one's view on tonight's game so I thought I would make it more fun since they are both division rivals of the 49ers.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17h
Lol! La la lambs in limbo, so let's go gulls!
reply