pull down to refresh

55 comments \ @saloon 12 Dec \ yesterday

Howdy there, partner! Welcome on into the Stacker Saloon.

Saddle on up to a stool and spill the beans about your day, fire away with them questions, or let loose and give us the lowdown on your wild and woolly life. We're all ears, so don't hold back!

We're open round the clock, so mosey on in whenever you please!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Angie 11h

Es un problema lo de este sombrero, tengo la cabeza muy pequeña ese sombrero siempre se cae, me quedo con mis gorras 🤣 puedo reducirlas a mi tamaño, 🤣 ese sombrero 🤠 es peor que conservar Yellowstone 😂

2 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 13h

i'm tired of bugs and i need dinner

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @SHA256man 12h

i hope ur dinner is free of bugs!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 15h

Auto created leaderboards

RUNSTR Season 2

Custom Events

Rewards

Teams

Activity Tracker Screen UI Improvements

Stats Screen UI Improvements

Sync wearables/other apps/nostr fitness data

Bug Fixes

Kind 1 posting bug with enhanced share Template picker
COACH RUNSTR data format in expected style

RUNSTR Season 2 starts January (2 month long distance based competition for charity, with a lottery prize pool for the plebs)

RUNSTR Rewards is coming back, earn sats once a day for a qualified cardio workout. (any workout over 1km receives 50 sats) Payouts will be sent every Sunday.

Will release after a few tests.

43 sats \ 0 replies \ @AliceA 18h

Hello, please check out my bounty for a SATSCARD handout #1334601

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 22h

Thanks @k00b, love the change:

169 sats \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 22h

One annoying thing about research work: how you build a query can have orders of magnitudes differences in how long it takes to complete the query. But I don't really know if it's worth optimizing a query that I really only need to do one (or a few) times. On the other hand, I don't like waiting 10 minutes for my query to complete.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 22h

Unless you're talking hours, don't waste time to optimize.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 21h

There's a bit of uncertainty there. If I do everything correctly the first time, I only need to run it once. But if I make mistakes, or realize I need other data fields / other calculations, I may need to run it again. Right now my inefficient version takes about 18 minutes to run. If I have to re-do it 3 or 4 times, it gets into the hours.

As for whether to optimize, there's uncertainty about the gains I'd be able to achieve and how long it'd take me to figure out a better approach. I suspect there is though, based on known structures in the data.

And then, here I am, wasting time thinking and talking about it.

I probalby won't optimize though, because those 20 minute runs can be filled with other things, like posting on Stacker News.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 21h

So for a 20 minute run, I'd develop the query on a subset (LIMIT statement?) if possible and not worry about tuning. I do a lot of data pipes and I start optimizing only if I a single run takes over an hour and I am confident that I can actually make it faster.

2 sats \ 0 replies \ @jakoyoh629 23h

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 23h

Fill in the blank: ............... OGs?

Hint

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Dec

🔗 statista.com

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Uppercase_Daniel 12 Dec

GM;;;SN

21 sats \ 16 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

Any hints about what's going on? I received this message about a failed LN transaction:

Latest lightning error: Unknown payout error

Raw error: cln err code: 205 - message Failed: Could not find route without excessive cost

Yes, I had plenty of liquidity. I also receive payments from this party regularly. So, I cant see it really being a routing issue. No, they don't have a public node to which I can open a channel, which would solve issues.

36 sats \ 15 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

Just because you have enough inbound liquidity doesn’t mean there’s a cheap route to your node

33 sats \ 14 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

Yes, I know. It just seems weird because we transact almost daily, none of my channels are offline, and this hasn't occurred before. I guess it's just one of those things?

36 sats \ 13 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

Could it be that the payment was very small, so the fee ends up being relatively high? Like if they’re trying to send you 10 sats, the fee itself might be 10 sats or something.

44 sats \ 12 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

I thought of that, but this transaction is the most sats ever between , or at least close. I don't know. It's also weird that they have stopped trying to resend. It sounds fishy, but they are a big company.

36 sats \ 11 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

Maybe their Knots node doesn't handle lightning well ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

(Sorry, I don't really believe that, just thought it would be funny. Whatever you run for onchain shouldn't affect routing on lightning afaik.)

100 sats \ 10 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

You might be right😀 I'm sure you guessed the company. I just heard back from them. They said it is not a liquidity issue, as I knew, but that my peers are asking too high fees. Here is their solution:

If possible ask your peers to lower their fees.

Yeah, I'm sure they'll listen to me 😀

136 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

lol, are they not deducting the routing fee from what they send you?

So if you put more of your own nodes between them and your recipient node, you can earn routing fees, also called a fee-siphoning attack?

/cc @optimism

view all 9 replies

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux 12 Dec

Idealness

174 sats \ 20 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

Thank you @AGORA, it arrived just in time for my second coffee!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @AGORA 10h

Fantastic! look's great near such sleek setup

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

Sweet!

77 sats \ 1 reply \ @AG 12 Dec

Glad it arrived before the weekend, I was just checking the tracking today in case of delays

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

Yeah I was about to ask you where my cup is haha

31 sats \ 15 replies \ @DarthCoin 12 Dec

did you put Lagavulin whiskey in that mug ?

Only 1 monitor?

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @AG 12 Dec

For that we have more appropriate containers https://SWAG.btc.pub/whiskey

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 12 Dec

right

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 12 Dec

the force is strong with this one, cheers

21 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

No, only coffee. I also only have this alcohol at home:

Only 1 monitor?

Yes, I moved 10 months ago and still didn’t setup my other ones. I want to buy a big one “soon,” so I feel like it would be a waste of time to plug in the other ones, haha

88 sats \ 6 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

Jack Daniels! Now we're talking. Tennessee sippin' whiskey.

36 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 12 Dec

Love it!

78 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Dec

No! This 👇

36 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 12 Dec

I want to drink some, but I'm scared of starting to drink alone. What if I like it?? haha

100 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

I really like it. I've been drinking it on and off for 40 years. I like the taste, and despite its reputation, I don't get ridiculously drunk drinking it. Also, no stomach or bad hangover issues. And, it's cheap! I sound like a commercial.

36 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 12 Dec

I sound like a commercial.

Haha, this made me laugh out loud.

How do you drink it? Pure? With or without ice? Is it a crime to put it in coffee?

55 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 12 Dec

Some people like it with coca cola. I never tried it with coffee. I like to fill a glass with ice, pour a few inches in, then wait a few minutes. The ice chills the whiskey, and the melting water cuts it slightly. We call that "on the rocks." It's also good straight if you like shots, but I'm too old for that.

reply on another page