True, a pseudo-identity can be created infinitely.

What can’t be created infinitely is the Bitcoin behind it.
That’s the part that can’t be faked, and the part that creates the constraint.

So the signature isn’t the signal by itself.
The economic weight attached to it is what makes the difference.

a signature from a pseudo-identity worth absolute ZERO, so why bother?
I can create infinite so called identities to sign a message, so is totally worthless for voting.
Voting in itself is dumb.

DarthCoin

bitcoin

What happens when Bitcoiners start signaling with signatures?

KoinVote


That risk is real, yes.

But without KYC, a signature only proves that 
“a holder exists”, not who the holder is.

A bad actor would still need some separate doxxing vector
to connect a signature with a physical identity.

So the safety question seems less about the signature itself,
and more about whatever personal exposure already existed.