Don’t have to when I’m not wrong. Sounds like you are projecting. LMAO

It's a fair criticism but it's a fine line as well. There are very few honest actors in the crypto, multichain world. Most are driven by perverse incentives and have no interest in actually improving Bitcoin. It is a lot to ask of people to be able to decipher and learn from the handful of good actors amongst a sea of bad (not all necessarily bad, but I am lumping those driven merely by perverse incentives here).

As an example: What am I to make of an individual such as Justin Bons who manages a european crypto fund and spends an inordinate amount of time bashing bitcoin and promoting proof of stake chains? Are some of his criticisms fair, possibly. Has his hedge fund outperformed, net of fees, simply holding bitcoin for the past 5 years, no. Does his business and livelihood go away if there is no "multichain" world, yes. Does he need Bitcoin dominance to erode in order to retain his investors, yes. So, is Justin an honest actor, with honest criticisms or does he just really need to foment distrust in Bitcoin so he can sell managing a portfolio of 30 assets to investors? Hard to say but hard to take him seriously with such perverse incentives.

I don't have an easy answer, I do agree at times bitcoiners can be too rigid and closed minded. It's reasonable to at least honestly debate the validity of things. But I also think sound, uncensorable, money available for billions to use is a moral imperative and until that is achieved I am disinterested in abc feature available on xyz chain and even more disinterested in deciphering if xyz chain really needs a token or if its feature set is something that can be added to additional bitcoin layers down the line after billions have access to what they need most.

Cheers, GR

Yours: 55.7k stacked \ 32.7k spent \ 38 posts \ 348 comments \ 44 referrals

"guaranteed to confirm within 5-10 minutes or instantly and don't cost me more than half a penny USD if anything at all"

Yea, because there's no one is using it. Wait until those chains try to scale. They will run into the same issues Bitcoin has, and they would eventually need Lightning as well if they became a global currency. Bitcoin placed higher importance on decentralization and integrity. This matters more on a layer 1 than ANYTHING else.

You are placing the importance on the wrong things, and I would wager it's because deep down you just want to make more fiat.

HAVE

FUN

STAYING

POOR

EAT DIRT

Funny !! A shitcoiner using a bitcoin only site.

I'm sorry you are struggling.

You need some humility. Maybe the author of this post can give you dome pointers.

Check your lingo here. You cant replace anything that is on chain. One can replace a TX that is in the mempool, but you shouldn't trust those.

How are you this dumb? Your mom drop you when you were young?

If you use a wallet that allows you to spend unconfirmed coin you really could get FUCKED

LMFAO you cant be serious