pull down to refresh

Reflecting on something that always repeats and will never change. Individuals kidnap other individuals, or do worse, and these subjugated individuals rarely defend themselves when the kidnapper is someone claiming to represent an entity, an abstraction (governments). It’s as if the aggressor ceases to be an individual and becomes something complex, superior—and the victim sees them that way too.
I even understand cases where people don’t defend themselves against this arbitrariness; the reasons vary: “Don’t react or you’ll die,” “They’ll realize it was a mistake,” “I’ll prove I’m innocent”—always the victim. In cases where these aggressions are frequent and systematic, the best alternative is to flee, because you don’t need to defend yourself or use violence. Yet most people submit, hire lawyers, and present themselves before them as citizens, acknowledging they’re not individuals but pieces needing a controller. They don’t properly defend themselves against these individuals when escape isn’t possible. Defense can be physical, lethal or not—but we won’t go down that path. Let’s take the path of “I don’t recognize these laws, and I don’t grant you my authority,” “I don’t recognize this demand you make of me.”
Many years ago, I gave a ride to a Black coworker. During conversations about politics, he questioned himself and asked me, “Why, during slavery in Brazil, weren’t there revolts that led to freedom? We were the majority—why didn’t everyone rise up and liberate themselves?” At the time, I replied that most likely, no one wanted to die, few would join, and everything would quickly return to how it was. If each individual asserted their own authority, thousands would certainly die—as happened in some revolts—but they wouldn’t know how to handle a majority of such individuals. So why have we never asserted ourselves? Examples abound even today, physical and financial, those who rebelled are forgotten, and the few who stand out among the victims become martyrs.
Someone must have already explained this—the belief the majority holds in authorities, which always leads to genocide, slavery, kidnappings, poverty, and worse. The Matrix is far denser, heavier, and a simple pill won’t fix it; you must leave the cocoon yourself, and depending on how you leave, the drones will deal with you.
177 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 26 Nov
the few who stand out among the victims become martyrs.
This is something I've been thinking some about lately. It seems to me that leaving the cocoon mostly always results in a waste of time and energy (and sometimes life), because the kidnappers have so much more time to waste--they're on the clock!
Your post also reminded me of the story of Dezi Freeman (#1245026) who still hasn't been caught.
reply
True, to make the situation even more tense, we play with constraints. The ideal is not to play, and not playing is an action the game does not allow.
reply
To better understand why people nowadays do not believe that are still living in slavery, watch this very important documentary - Slavery by consent
Being free also means to be responsible for your own actions, thing that not many people want to be...
reply
I watched it, and from time to time I go back to pick up bits I didn’t fully understand the first time. It’s old—why hasn’t anyone made another version or something similar to this?
Being free also means to be responsible for your own actions, thing that not many people want to be...
This is something that heavily implies Siggy’s post about adoption. No one wants to be responsible with their own money.
reply
reply
As individuals humans are weak and vulnerable. This is why we form groups to protect ourselves and to advance our interests over those of others. In a dominant society, such as the west has been for the last 500 years it is possible to achieve greater and greater individual freedoms and 'rights' but over time a dominant society that forgets that its dominance is largely due to its collective ability to project its power over other human groups risks losing that dominance and the individual freedoms and 'rights' that have been gained largely due to the subjugation of others.
reply
This is the justification people make for themselves to avoid taking responsibility. The last sentence of my post speaks directly against this.
reply
So have you thrown off the protective cocoon of the state and its protective layers of law and order, military defense and economic infrastructure and support? No you have not. Libertarians are invariably blatant hypocrits.
reply
They are bad people who steal from you to supposedly protect you from bad people; if you don’t pay, you’ll suffer violence. That’s all.
reply
So have you thrown off the protective cocoon of the state and its protective layers of law and order, military defense and economic infrastructure and support??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
No you have not.
Libertarians are invariably blatant hypocrits.
reply
there's a big difference in
being a user vs being used
reply
So have you thrown off the protective cocoon of the state and its protective layers of law and order, military defense and economic infrastructure and support?
No you have not.
Hypocrit.