pull down to refresh
deleted by author
Wrong - Smith clearly indicates cartels are a problem and that governments should and can act against them.
God is long dead . . . He was used by the state for millennia and you still appeal to him for authority - oh dear.
deleted by author
Not all cartels are formal trade associations.
You want anyone to be able to call himself a doctor, dentist or an engineer?
No wonder you have been ostracized from mainstream politics.
Go live somewhere there is no government and practice your lunacy where others will not be harmed- oh but you won't because you are not insane or suicidal, are you?
deleted by author
Go live somewhere there is no government and practice your lunacy where others will not be harmed- oh but you won't because you are not insane or suicidal, are you?
deleted by author
I do pay tax sometimes when I sell it to pay for my living expenses.
Would much rather pay taxes and have rule of law and property rights than live in a lawless Libertarian jungle where might is right.
Go live somewhere there is no government and practice your lunacy where others will not be harmed- oh but wait... you won't, will you, because you are not insane or suicidal, are you? No, you are just a hypocrit
deleted by author
Plus federalism
We have functional states vs dysfunctional states
No, without government there would be no way to reduce cartels duopolies and monopolies- we would be ruled by corporations. Which is what is happening in the USA today with the government largely owned by its corporate sponsors. Crony capitalism is not ideal- it makes your USA inefficient and very likely to lose against the mercantile determination of China. Enjoy your coming 100 years of humiliation as a consequence of abandoning the mixed economy features such as robust anti trust laws and your stupid Libertarian free market fixes all nonsense which left you with no rare earths and militarily hostage to China.