pull down to refresh

190 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Nov \ parent \ on: Researchers question Anthropic claim that AI-assisted attack was 90% autonomous AI

Right. Maybe I missed it, but I didn’t see anywhere in the report saying the AI was the one that found the 0day vulnerability.

write
preview
55 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 14 Nov

Yeah they just imply it with the 90%. "Give SuperClaude a list of targets and yeah... pwned" lol

reply
203 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Nov

Correction: 80%-90% 🤠

Overall, the threat actor was able to use AI to perform 80-90% of the campaign, with human intervention required only sporadically (perhaps 4-6 critical decision points per hacking campaign).

https://www.anthropic.com/news/disrupting-AI-espionage
reply
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 14 Nov

Okay. Here's a mindfuck back at them: How do they have any idea what the humans did unless they were employing them?

reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Nov

¯\(ツ)/¯

reply