pull down to refresh
Correction: 80%-90% ðŸ¤
Overall, the threat actor was able to use AI to perform 80-90% of the campaign, with human intervention required only sporadically (perhaps 4-6 critical decision points per hacking campaign).https://www.anthropic.com/news/disrupting-AI-espionage
Okay. Here's a mindfuck back at them: How do they have any idea what the humans did unless they were employing them?
¯\(ツ)/¯
Correction: 80%-90% ðŸ¤