pull down to refresh

103 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 11h
I wonder when people will pay more attention to my past warnings: #688652
reply
Didn’t they tell users they did this?
reply
70 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 10h
I think it was well known that Samurai mobile wallet was exposing your XPUB. Sparrow had it blinded so I'm not sure why they couldn't do it too
reply
I forgot the reason why they did it but if you ran your own node I think you avoided this privacy leak
reply
I’m not a specialist, but I think some users have to provide the xpub. Is that right, @DarthCoin?
The prosecution herein refers to a main point of criticism of Samourai Wallet's design by competitors and privacy advocates, in which users who did not run their own node provided their extended public key (XPub) to Samourai Wallet's coordinator, allowing the developers to cross-reference transactions.
But the memorandum incorrectly assumes that there was "no technical or operational necessity to do so." As Hill clarifies, "the need to collect this 'XPUB' data was driven the functional necessity of calculating balances" while operating a light wallet, highlighting that only around 20% of users were affected by this design decision.
reply
Practicing What You Preach: Samourai Could Demix Transactions #1273202
reply