pull down to refresh
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker OP 2h \ parent \ on: Research in Public #05: Does btc price affect SN behavior? Experiment failure! econ
You're right. I was thinking about it wrongly for a second there. I would be really surprised if daily fluctuations mattered even after controlling for week fixed effects. I should probably try it, but if that were to happen I'd probably think it was bot related.
This is why it's so tricky. If zapping actually leads to positive ROI denominated in sats, then higher bitcoin price should incentivize more zapping, not less. I do think there's some variation to be exploited regarding the return function between reward amount and zap amount.
Another tricky thing about this is that the reward system has changed multiple times throughout SN's life, which means I'd have to try and back out those periods.
There was one month when the rewards were entirely based on zapping and another when they were entirely based on posting/commenting.
Maybe looking at those two months separately could tell us something about responsiveness to rewards for zapping.
reply
Good idea. I need to dig through k00b's announcements on reward changes and construct a history of regime switches.
reply