reply on: AI devs close to scraping bottom of data barrel \ stacker news ~AI

pull down to refresh

55 sats \ 9 replies \ @magnolia_mayhem 5 Oct \ on: AI devs close to scraping bottom of data barrel AI

Back in the 90s, I watched a documentary where the narrator mentioned that any future AI would need to have a robot body to experience the world and learn.

In 2016, I read articles about training ANNs and thought "No, looks like we've got enough data digitized to not need robot bodies."

Today, I decided they need robot bodies again.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Oct

Didn't you mean AGI instead of AI?

135 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 5 Oct

Back in the 90s, there wasn't some weak form of autocomplete++ envisioned that wasn't AGI. There was just AGI; i.e. what we don't have.

I also loved the Terminator sequels.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 6 Oct

All the sequels? I've only watched T2. I was worried further sequels wouldn't live up to first two.

102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6 Oct

In the 90s I think there only was T2. But a decade later I did enjoy T3. After that I stopped.

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Oct

I am on my way to where I am not.

view on www.youtube.com

António Variações - Estou Além (Videoclipe Oficial 1982)

translation: https://lusobritish.blog/2024/02/27/estou-alem/

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 5 Oct

Just to play devils advocate, how do you know we humans aren't just autocomplete bots?

I've certainly met some humans who behave as if they're on autocomplete

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6 Oct

If you take one aspect of any complex system and you simulate it, is it the same? I don't think so. If you take a second aspect, and simulate that too, is it the same then?