Those spiffy AI systems that tech companies keep promising require mountains of training data, but high-quality sources may have already run out—unless enterprises can unlock the information trapped behind their firewalls, according to Goldman SachsTraining data is the Achilles heel of massive new AI models, as detailed by George Lee, co-head of the Goldman Sachs Global Institute, in a recent webcast on data's role in AI."The quality of the outputs from these models, particularly in enterprise settings, is highly dependent on the quality of the data that you're sourcing and referencing," Lee said.The problem is finding enough quality data, according to Neema Raphael, Goldman Sachs' chief data officer and head of data engineering. Some developers may be resorting to synthetic data or training models on the output of existing AI systems.
pull down to refresh
related posts
55 sats \ 9 replies \ @magnolia_mayhem 9h
Back in the 90s, I watched a documentary where the narrator mentioned that any future AI would need to have a robot body to experience the world and learn.
In 2016, I read articles about training ANNs and thought "No, looks like we've got enough data digitized to not need robot bodies."
Today, I decided they need robot bodies again.
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 9h
Didn't you mean AGI instead of AI?
reply
135 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 8h
Back in the 90s, there wasn't some weak form of autocomplete++ envisioned that wasn't AGI. There was just AGI; i.e. what we don't have.
I also loved the Terminator sequels.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 7h
All the sequels? I've only watched T2. I was worried further sequels wouldn't live up to first two.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 30m
In the 90s I think there only was T2. But a decade later I did enjoy T3. After that I stopped.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 8h
I am on my way to where I am not.
António Variações - Estou Além (Videoclipe Oficial 1982)
translation: https://lusobritish.blog/2024/02/27/estou-alem/
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 8h
Just to play devils advocate, how do you know we humans aren't just autocomplete bots?
I've certainly met some humans who behave as if they're on autocomplete
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 31m
If you take one aspect of any complex system and you simulate it, is it the same? I don't think so. If you take a second aspect, and simulate that too, is it the same then?
I'd say no.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @BeeRye 6h
do you happen to remember the documentary ?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @magnolia_mayhem 4h
No, but I'll dig over the next couple days an report back if I find it.
reply