pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 15 replies \ @Undisciplined 2 Oct \ on: 48 hours before Charlie Kirk was assassinated, he made a dramatic statement news
I saw a good Kiim Iversen video covering inconsistencies in the official narrative.
There's been even more audio analysis and it all points to the same location, which is opposite from where Robinson supposedly was. And, there's surveillance footage showing someone on the roof in the indicated position.
A question that came to mind, though, is whether Robinson has ever said that he was on the roof that the official narrative puts him on. Maybe he is the shooter and was on the rooftop that the audio analysis says the shot came from.
Regarding what Robinson said - I don't think he's made any statements at all. At first they were saying he confessed, but then the story changed to "he's not cooperating".
I just wonder if he's going to "commit suicide", like Epstein.
reply
Didn't he enter a guilty plea? I know that doesn't necessarily mean he did it, but it suggests he did, since the death penalty is on the table.
reply
Apparently he didn't. Here's what Grok says:
No, Tyler Robinson did not enter a guilty plea as of October 2, 2025. He is the 22-year-old suspect charged with aggravated murder and six other felonies in the September 10, 2025, shooting death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. During his initial court appearance on September 16, 2025, in Utah's Fourth District Court, Robinson did not enter any plea and was held without bail. His defense team requested more time to review evidence before deciding on a preliminary hearing, with a waiver hearing scheduled for September 29, 2025. An arraignment—where a formal guilty or not guilty plea would typically be entered—has not yet occurred, and no updates indicate one since then. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, and the case is progressing toward a potential trial in 2026 or later.
Also, btw - Grok is REALLY good for quick summaries of recent events. Not that it's always the truth, but for stuff like this, simple matters of fact, it's pretty good.
reply
reply
Absolutely
The reason I still think Tyler being the shooter makes the most sense is because it would be very hard to believe that his parents turned him in otherwise. I don't think I'd turn my kid in, even if I knew she did it.
reply
This one? Was Tyler Robinson a Patsy? Deep Investigation Exposes the Plot Holes in the Kirk Shooting
Looks like another video is going on my watch list. Or I may read it - the transcript that YouTube provides is sometimes pretty good, and obviously much easier to scan and summarize. As a matter of fact, I've taken the transcript of videos recently, and put them into AI to summarize. That's one thing that AI is really good at.
reply
It was this video: https://rumble.com/v6zbpz2-literally-no-one-believes-official-charlie-kirk-assassination-narrative.html
Kim puts her more sensitive stuff on Rumble, since YouTube punishes people for asking honest questions.
She also asks the obvious question about why the footage of supposedly Tyler fleeing the roof begins immediately after he supposedly fired the shot, when that camera would have shown him firing just a few seconds before.
reply
There's been even more audio analysis and it all points to the same location, which is opposite from where Robinson supposedly was. And, there's surveillance footage showing someone on the roof in the indicated position.
this argument is useless without coordinates on the agreed map of where it happened, preferably the same one that any security company present had used for planning their services.
emphasis mine, due to getting triggered by words that have strict logical meanings mutually unaligned when people of wildly different backgrounds pretend that English is one language.
you're welcome to argue with eachother about names of buildings; I'll be studying the predyx bet about whether IDs will overflow arbitrary unnamed numbers...
reply
this argument is useless without coordinates on the agreed map of where it happened
Which coordinates are in doubt? The cell phone locations for the video are placed by their GPS, we know where Kirk was, and there's an official narrative around the shooter's location.
There may well be problems with this kind of analysis (including that it might be complete BS), but I don't understand this issue about an agreed upon map.
reply
this argument is useless without coordinates on the agreed map of where it happenedWhich coordinates are in doubt? The cell phone locations for the video are placed by their GPS, we know where Kirk was, and there's an official narrative around the shooter's location.
please consider rereading the entire sequence of comments [quotes and emphases included] leading to this one; I got triggered by people pretending that the word "opposite" is obviously interpretable, and could care less which specific coordinates are used for arguing about directions relative to line of fire.
reply
You seem very touchy about a colloquial word.
I used "opposite" to denote that the audio evidence indicates the shot came from the opposite side of Charlie Kirk, as compared to the official account. That is how the word is generally used in that context.
reply
There may well be problems with this kind of analysis (including that it might be complete BS), but I don't understand this issue about an agreed upon map.
please link to it; anchor's target does not have to be within
m.stacker.news, although in this case, hosting the media independently of wherever you found it originally might actually be prudent.reply
I link to the video in this comment #1245752
reply
videos are worse than useless; my willing participation in the increase of territory fees from this thread requires one image [preferably scalable vector graphics, although bitmaps are tolerable] including planview of all buildings and courtyards within one kilometre of the stage.
supposedly, that's more than enough for the trajectory, along with any arguments about where the shooter climbed, jumped, and landed.
by the way, I could care less about who's feelings get hurt; and thank you for reducing my participation fees below fifty satoshi per response, with the other comment; however, I will probably not respond again, due more to the demands upon my time, than those upon my credit[s].
reply
Ok, well, I wasn't talking to you, so go find your own images that satisfy your own curiosity.
It's not my job to convince you of anything or provide you with any particular evidence.
reply