pull down to refresh

You can keep a channel open even if its empty and continue to receive with it.
Actually you know I don't expect people to store their life savings on ln either. I'd anticipate them to ln to on-chain swap to cold storage, but those funds should be used pretty infrequently.
I mean so far we've seen improvement after improvement where txs are smaller and smaller and therefore cost less and less.
I remember when people used to worry that ln would mean the death of on-chain tx fees and therefore the death of mining and therefore the death of Bitcoin. Now I see you speculating the other way around. So can we just wait until we run into a real problem rather than speculating on problems that don't exist causing us to chase our tails?
You are right.. I believe that we will find solution.. But even current development should consider the probability of further potential ways..
And we should beware that some custodial solutions do not prevail...
reply
I agree with that. I hate the custodial stuff. Custodial transactions even in mainstream Bitcoin adoption is a fail condition to me.
Its just that we should be building solutions to experienced problems and right now on-chain fees are not an experienced problem. Even when fees are temporarily high, as long as you have an ln channel you don't have to worry about it.
reply