pull down to refresh

but I don't know that prolonging the existence of inefficiency is a better outcome.
Yeah, I agree. But it's often more nuanced than a black or white answer. Something is not either efficient or inefficient. Lots of jobs, especially at the NGO level, cannot be reduced to a simple profitability number. That's why I never thought someone in charge of a for-profit company like Tesla would be the right person to assess efficiency for USAID. Turns out he wasn't.
Usaid was a terrorist organization
reply
Usaid was a terrorist organization
That's debatable~~
reply
The state is a terrorist organization so parts of it also are terrorist organizations.
Terrorist defined as achieving political goals by force.
That’s the primary job and publicly acknowledged job of the state
It’s not really debatable unless you start redefining language
reply