pull down to refresh

Jessica Whited shows a photo of one of her proudest moments. She stands with her parents — an autoworker and a schoolteacher — after winning a Presidential Early Career Award signed by President Donald Trump, honoring her as one of the nation’s most promising young scientists.
Six years later, the second Trump administration delivered a blow to her science, cutting nearly all the funding for her work on illuminating the molecular secrets of how salamanders regrow limbs — and how these mechanisms might be used to help human patients.
“Emotionally, it stings,” said Whited, associate professor in the Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, fighting back tears. “It feels very personal. It took me 19 years to build this axolotl colony and research program with a goal to ultimately help human lives. It couldn’t have come at a worse time.”
The recent funding cuts have damaged research across the University. Whited was hit particularly hard. She lost five separate federal grants worth $4.2 million, or about 90 percent of her research budget.
“The strokes coming down are just so broad and heavy-handed,” she said. “They were not really scrutinizing the individuals that were affected. But I find it very ironic the way we can be characterized as a bunch of ivory tower elitists who don’t have any sense of what’s going on outside in the rest of the world — even while our research is dedicated to solving hard problems that impact human health.”
It's the Harvard Gazette, so there is some specific framing. Still, there is an important human factor behind all those budget cuts.
My sister had a job at one of the big NGOs that did a lot of work for USAID. She ran a program that delivered surplus meds to various developing countries.
Around early February there was some word that they had lost some of their grant funding, but it was one of the really big NGOs and she was in a role that was seemingly important.
A week later there was definite news of layoffs, but probably not her.
A week later she didn't have a job.
She got very hurt by the layoff and definitely took it personally. She, illogically, blamed my parents (both of whom voted for Trump). She got fairly angry with me for no reason other than that I said it wasn't that big of a deal and that she would probably get a new job soon.
Now, if you ask me, there was rather a lot of inefficiency as this large NGO she worked for. Perhaps they were doing some good (I'm a little skeptical, but trying to be charitable), but definitely had a lot of vibes of living off the fat of the government contract.
My sister, a wonderful person and a hard worker, was used to working remote, and never attending meetings with a camera on. To be fully honest, I'm not quite sure what she did for them.
I agree there is a human factor, but I don't know that prolonging the existence of inefficiency is a better outcome. My sister has a new job now. I don't think she likes it as much, but I'm hopeful she'll build on a new trajectory.
reply
but I don't know that prolonging the existence of inefficiency is a better outcome.
Yeah, I agree. But it's often more nuanced than a black or white answer. Something is not either efficient or inefficient. Lots of jobs, especially at the NGO level, cannot be reduced to a simple profitability number. That's why I never thought someone in charge of a for-profit company like Tesla would be the right person to assess efficiency for USAID. Turns out he wasn't.
reply
Usaid was a terrorist organization
reply
Usaid was a terrorist organization
That's debatable~~
reply
The state is a terrorist organization so parts of it also are terrorist organizations.
Terrorist defined as achieving political goals by force.
That’s the primary job and publicly acknowledged job of the state
It’s not really debatable unless you start redefining language
reply
Are they getting it reinstated? I think I read that UCLA just had all its NSF and NIH grant funding restored. I'd be surprised if Harvard couldn't also get it?
reply
Good if some of the grants are getting reinstated, I don't know if they are.
But in a sense, I'd be even more pissed if I'm part of the people who get laid off, and then called back in, coz we made a mistake and didn't realize you were actually doing valuable/useful work.
There should be consequences for these kinds of mistakes, too. This can really fuck with people's lives.
reply
The lesson is you shouldn’t be working for the government
reply
That's one possible lesson, indeed.
I am on government contracts, so I'm likely biased~~
reply
Stop enabling tyranny please
Tyranny defined as the state terrorists forcing people to do things or pay for things without voluntary contract.
We pay taxes or we are locked up in a cage like animals. That’s tyranny. I did not agree or sign any contract authorizing the taxes I pay.
I’m sure you can find regular work.
reply
I don't want regular work.
No private company would pay for the kind of fundamental research I do.
I support your right to opt out.
reply
Maybe we would pay you for it if the government didn’t hold a monopoly on everything forcing us to get licenses for everything and tax us into poverty so we have zero extra money to spend on theoretical science
reply
Side question.
Where do you see this most likely to develop first, minimal or absence of government and voluntary contractual opting in/out to any system of governance?
I'm in Korea, a very collectivistic society. No one would even entertain the thought this to be a viable option.
totally agree, not trying to minimize Trump's actions at all.
reply