pull down to refresh
102 sats \ 4 replies \ @Artilektt 15h \ parent \ on: Nicolas Dorier (BTC Payserver): increasing OP_RETURN limit will help our users bitcoin
Right but in the thread don't they touch on the fact that not many are likely to move to OP_RETURN because it will still be cheaper to do it the other way.
Not many will move from using inscriptions (Taproot input scripts) to OP_RETURN (an output type). But some that are storing arbitrary data that aren't inscriptions (JPEGs etc), but are using fake public keys creating unprovably-unspendable outputs that permanently bloat the UTXO set, will hopefully switch to OP_RETURN.
reply
reply
indeed
reply
Right, that's why I qualified my statement with "to the extent that"
I hope the spamming is just a fad and all the spammers lose all their money. No one needs jpegs on the blockchain and there are better technologies for that.
reply