pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @justin_shocknet 17h \ parent \ on: Two Questions for Lightning Experts lightning
You're saying it's deceitful to say that only nodes that can route payments matter for reliability?
Routing is a function of a receiver being online to receive what's routed.
Does it not matter for reliability to have nodes that can route payments?
Is this a serious question?
removing the onlineness incentive
What does this have to do with what I said?
I'm not sure wtf you're talking about at all... if nodes are offline that's bad for reliability. How hard is this?
I literally said I would run a routing node if there was less risk
Less risk of what? shooting yourself in the foot or someone else shooting you?
The fact you keep using the phrase routing node inclines me to think you shouldn't be running one.
They didn't pivot. They have no intentions of abandoning the mobile wallet.
Absolutely did, pivot doesn't mean abandoning old customers, in means looking for new ones.... because mobile is a dead end and can never work commercially or at scale.
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 17h
Routing is a function of a receiver being online to receive what's routed.
There's no routing if I have a direct channel
I won't reply to the other stuff, I see no point in continuing this discussion
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 17h
You're the one that keeps talking about routing, not me. Good luck with your direct channel if your peer is offline.
I see no point in continuing this discussion
Lightning 101 is down the hall.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 16h
My peer did send me an invoice to pay them. They will be online.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 16h
They will be online.
Guess you won't try to cheat them by publishing an old state then.
reply