pull down to refresh

Mr. Shin taking names and kicking ass:
the last few years has just produced more ways to integrate with the old order, to placate them, to adapt to them rather than vice versa. There isn’t much driving at disrupting the old order. The spark seems mostly gone.
One long-forgotten idea: Assassination markets!
Not necessarily to kill someone, but a nice little betting market for someone's death (HASHTAG @mega_dreamer!):
This is obviously a highly unethical, immoral, and wildly dangerous idea. But it’s also a powerful one, and revolutionary. A successful assassination market working at scale would radically alter the calculus of the governing interacting with the governed.

"How different would the world be if leaders had to weigh the risk of inciting an evergrowing pot of money incentivizing their untimely demise if they did something unpopular or detrimental to those they governed?"

Cypherpunks need to dream of true disruption again. People can do all kinds of things if they want to, they just need to imagine them first.
Love to see it.
LMAO. I'd rather focus on non-violent disruptions... like, say, Bitcoin?
reply
Well, I agree in principle. But Bitcoin isn't really disrupting much these days, is it?
And I say that as a staunch supporter of Jeff Booth's thesis about how it's going to happen.
Bitcoin might eventually change everything. But why are today's Bitcoiners so content living within the fiat system. They appear to have no desire to really change anything. They talk about change, but continue working for dollars, spending dollars, and denominating their life in dollars.
The prevailing fiat system SHOULD be provoking us into violence, not peaceful apathy.
reply
I agree, instead its just becoming more and more conformant and KYC based asset.
Personally I'm very concerned by bitcoiners rooting for bitcoin treasury companies buying more bitcoin.
No one has been thinking what this will do bitcoin if a "Black Friday of 1929" like event occurs in our stock markets. In such event, the stock traders will not give a shit whether the company is backed by BTC, gold or dirt. They will exit as soon as they can. Thus forcing these bitcoin treasury companies to liquidate BTC at any price. The aftermath will be catastrophic for bitcoin.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatbad 9h
Exactly.
On the other hand, if Bitcoin is being used widely for commerce, it would be the money everyone runs to during a Black-Swan.
Ultimately, it needs to actively threaten the current system. If it is not, it is failing.
I'm conflicted about whether it is threatening fiat in a sustainable way.
reply
GIEF VIOLENCE!
reply
They have one for Lula.
You can also do like they did for Khamenei, where assassination is just one of the possibilities.
reply
HAHAHAH what, didn't know! fantastic.
Set up some Westerners, too.
reply
They had a market for another assassination attempt on Trump
reply
before or after the first one(s)?
reply
I think Predyx launched shortly after the second one.
reply
Yes - we do, but only if its not a direct assassination market. Please see this: #1060189
reply
assassination markets are awesome!
until some 4chan dorktrolls put out a hummingbird drone hit on you, just for the lolz.
🐦💣🥸🤯☠️
talkin to you @denlillaapan
reply
such fuckers... unfair!
reply
We try to stay away from Death market because of its unethical and violence nature. However we do permit some ethical ones like few examples below:
  1. Assassination attempt is NOT equal to assassination, especially for public political figures.
  2. Death due to poor health/medical conditions
  3. And Khamenei is just one-off case, though assassination is not the prime reason.
We will NEVER do markets like: Will [insert person name] be assassinated in 2025?
reply
Oh well
reply
Generally speaking, you don’t want a participant in a market to be able to determine the outcome unilaterally, setting other ethical concerns aside.
reply
54 sats \ 3 replies \ @Se7enZ 15h
Published by... Bitcoin Magazine?!? 🤡
reply
Yessir, we got a problem with that?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Se7enZ 14h
Yessir we do.
reply
That's a shame. Have you tried feeling differently?
reply
Not a huge fan of Shinobi. Used to be until he turned into a perpetual whiner about how Bitcoin maxis hurt him but he raises some good points.
reply
Total agreement. The most dangerous thing to any form of power isn’t violence — it’s imagination. The ability of people to envision a world where authority isn’t absolute or untouchable. Assassination markets, as shocking as they may sound, serve less as a practical proposal and more as an ideological provocation: they remind us that the relationship between rulers and the ruled isn’t some natural law — it’s a power dynamic that can be inverted. We need fewer "compliance frameworks" and more scenarios of collapse.
reply
Assassination markets, as shocking as they may sound, serve less as a practical proposal and more as an ideological provocation: they remind us that the relationship between rulers and the ruled isn’t some natural law — it’s a power dynamic that can be inverted. fuck, that's beautifully put. 10 points to Gryffindor
reply