Exactly, which is why .gov doesn't really care about CDBCs from that end. Its actually easier and better for them to outsource the surveillance. They get the best of all words: They don't need to risk constitutional challenges, less physical work and money for them, still get the same data, and its yet another pressure point for them to keep on large banks which makes sure that the job hopping pipeline from regulator -> corporate consultant stays open.

Like the laws preventing illegal entry over the border, right Paul?