pull down to refresh

Here's some of the reasons I think bitcoiners keep their coins in exchanges or ETFs.
  • Trust in institutions. People trust the government, they trust banks and exchanges. This means they haven't studied history, but that's the way it is.
  • They want to, but have heard the horror stories about losing seed phrases, or making a mistake in a send, and "poof", all your bitcoin is gone.
  • They're afraid of the new technology. And for lots of people, ANY new technology is hard - too hard to actually use.
I have had a few older people take the workshops I've been giving, going through my book Bitcoin, Hands-On, that I've worried about, in terms of self-custody, and thought it's probably too much for them.
And while I do help them, I also nudge them to involve their kids in bitcoin, so there's someone else who will learn it. They're just not technical enough.
In my book, I have an analogy between learning how to self-custody bitcoin, and learning to drive.
When you’re learning to drive a car, do you immediately start driving on the highway? No, you don’t. You head to a large parking lot, and practice driving there. You make a lot of left turns and right turns, starts and stops. That’s what you’ll be doing in Bitcoin, Hands-On—lots of practice, in a low-risk environment. Working your way through this book will help you overcome the anxiety that can come with managing your own bitcoin. The exercises use a few temporary, small test wallets, that you create and control. This is the Bitcoin equivalent of taking your first drive in a parking lot, to learn about the steering wheel, gas pedal, and brake.
And I think that when/if holding your own bitcoin is looked upon as being as important as driving, then YES, people will learn.
It is quite unfortunate. As a more meaningful percent of bitcoin move out of self custody into 'institutions' and 'custodians', it becomes more likely that paper bitcoin can be sold ad infinitem, like what we've seen with gold over the last few decades.
This destroys one of the most fundamental values of bitcoin, 21 million.
The number of people with very large audiences talking about why one should NOT self custody but instead buy ETFs or keep coins on 'trusted' exchanges is mind boggling. Just to call out a few: Wolf of All Streets (he and Gary Cardone had a video yesterday where they talked about most ppl should not self custody), PlanB (the guy who made the now debunked "stock to flow" price models), Fred Krueger (dotkrueger on twitter).
reply
People are scared of it. They add used to banks and FDIC insured and password resets. Personal responsibility is foreign to our society.
reply
537 sats \ 0 replies \ @000w2 13 Jul
I'm scared of driving, to the point where I trust random people and even robots to drive me around, rather than trust myself. My life is literally in their hands, and I trust them more. But would never trust an exchange with my keys.
reply
Modern people are too stressed and have no free time to learn self custody. It is too complicated for a non-IT person to check open source code. So between trusting institutions that custody Bitcoin and institutions that sell hardware wallets, they choose the former. Option not to trust anyone just does not exist for an average Joe.
reply
Great response! I think this is why its so important for all of us who are technically able to understand and help to really talk to people who trust us, and help them self-custody.
reply
Trust in institutions and convenience in password recovery. This are the two that got in the way one me taking self custody of my BTC. I’ve forgotten password for emails, subscriptions, bank and countless other things so getting over this fear was the hardest of the two.
reply
Or they are going to sell soon.
reply
101 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 13 Jul
Bring it today, tomorrow or in dies years. I prefer to keep the full power of making that decision.
You can want to sell soon or then, but if it is not in your hands, you really do not be certain that it can be carried out when you decide.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 19h
Sell for what?
reply
i recently helped a someone onboard to bitcoin and ln which made me realize the tools for self custody have gotten very good.
i find the bigger hurdle is helping them appreciate the significance of bitcoin. so many people are very willing to accept the status quo, even if they realize that banks and governments are generally nefarious.
reply
What self custody tools in particular did you think were good?
reply
zeus wallet. the reaction i got was, that's it?! no sign in?! they've made it easy to restore from seed, and then the ln integration is really good, too.
reply
No kidding, Zeus? I tried that (it's been a while now) and had endless issues. I was using it for Lightning.
There was always a way forward, if you do the research and hang out in the forums and ask questions. But it was very tricky, at least back then.
So, now it's much better? Is this mainly for bitcoin, or lightning?
reply
lightninf. self-custodial lightning is a bit clunky for noobs, and i think they've done well making it relatively painless.
reply
Trust is something tricky in the world we live in. We doubt ourselves, our partners, but we trust governments and strangers and so on. Even so, I do have the strong feeling that AI will help people own their BTC for good. When AI will become as usual as "Hey Google/Alexa/Siri", this (the self-custody BTC) will probably be a sure thing. At the moment the main reason for not using self-custody for BTC I think is human memory and the way it faults in time, in the worse possible way. (I myself am my own memory victim.)
reply
And I think that when/if holding your own bitcoin is looked upon as being as important as driving, then YES, people will learn.
Totally give agreement, with this logic. I consider that it is about that, they still do not understand how important their own bank is to be.

People:

  • Zero knowledge about opposing risk.
  • Blind faith, in institutions that have already failed in the past.
  • Short memory (people already forget 2008, Breton Woods's breakup, and many other things)
  • Zero trust (common people sometimes rely more in third parties than themselves)
Only a few examples.
reply
Another corollary to this concept, of "when holding your own bitcoin is looked upon as being as important as driving, people will learn", is this:
Some people (perhaps many) will NOT learn. Just like they can't learn to drive. Or can't learn a foreign language.
reply
As self-driving cars becomes more ubiquitous, I think people won't see driving as an important skill to have, and may even welcome not having the responsibility of driving.
reply
exact! I also think about it.
It is a contradictory duality.
"Bitcoin is for everyone, and at the same time, Bitcoin is not for everyone."
reply
I heard a new one the other day. Someone I knows doesn't self custody, because they believe it will be a complicated tax situation if they take self-custody. I think there needs to be more education on the tax side with bitcoin, many think sending bitcoin causes a taxable event (even if to cold storage).
reply
Yep, I think its legit concern. In today’s fiat system in the US, any significant income to your bank account, ie if you wanna buy a house, is scrutinized (ie where did you get this from?) and its reasonable to assume that centralized exchange will be forced to do the same. So if you need to sell it on an exchange (finding someone peer-to-peer requires a lot more work and danger to get screwed, especially to normal people who trust the institutions), you will need to prove where you got it from and it will be easier when the institution can prove when you bought it.
Not saying I endorse this, just my attempt to explain.
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @Grateful 17h
You need to be a techie or technically inclined to understand the concepts behind self-custody so improvements to the user experience and ease-of-use should help lower the barriers for everyone.
reply
It's hard, it's expensive, and if I leave it on exchange or in ETFs, it's not my fault if something goes wrong
reply
plus...everyone ELSE is leaving it on exchanges or in ETFs, so...safety in numbers.
reply
When “everyone else” does it, you also wont look as stupid if anything goes wrong. That’s my observation how people work.
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @ken 13 Jul
They underestimate the risk. The bitcoin is there until it isn't.
reply
I recommended my mom to the Bitcoin ETF. Should would not be ok with self custody. And she's just on the fence. She has no idea about Bitcoin, just trusts me. I'm sure she has no idea Bitcoin is at all time high. Without the ETFs, I would have never tried to tell her about Bitcoin.
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @Macoy31 14h
This is such a thoughtful and relatable breakdown. Self-custody can feel overwhelming at first, especially for people who didn’t grow up with tech but your driving analogy really nails it. Start slow, practice in a safe space, and build confidence over time. Bitcoin is financial sovereignty, but just like driving, it takes guidance, patience, and real hands-on experience. Thanks for helping others cross that bridge safely
reply
They have reason to trust on institutions. Institutions should integrate crypto technology. Whatsapp and Telegram is full of scams.
reply
People are afraid of sovereignty
reply