I am a full supporter of the automated offside in football. I think that reduces the option of mistakes made by referees. It is hard to look at two places at the same time. If it works well, it's superior to humans.
Definitely! Before the automated system , offside was decided by a referee looking at a screen and deciding whether the player was in line with or behind the defenders or not. Unsurprisingly, whenever a big fish was involved, the decision was in favor of the big one. Also, most of times, it took a long time to get an answer. Now it's a matter of seconds and you can see the decisions are fairer.
Just in case you have some shares.... PSG is crushing Real Madrid in the Club World Club semifinal.
I am a full supporter of the automated offside in football. I think that reduces the option of mistakes made by referees. It is hard to look at two places at the same time. If it works well, it's superior to humans.
I am a big fan of getting the call right.
Definitely! Before the automated system , offside was decided by a referee looking at a screen and deciding whether the player was in line with or behind the defenders or not. Unsurprisingly, whenever a big fish was involved, the decision was in favor of the big one. Also, most of times, it took a long time to get an answer. Now it's a matter of seconds and you can see the decisions are fairer.
Just in case you have some shares.... PSG is crushing Real Madrid in the Club World Club semifinal.
I don't think the implementation will happen overnight.
I will say I do like the appeal thing in the minors that is super quick
Interesting, given what seems to be happening at Wimbledon:
https://www.wsj.com/sports/tennis/wimbledon-hawkeye-line-calling-e2ccff6d?st=57bmXg&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
We will see how it goes. Should be fun to watch.
Now I might watch
https://xcancel.com/theathletic/status/1943025004712726594