I noticed this at the bottom of the new Google image gen:
To help maintain trust and transparency, all images generated by Imagen 4 models will continue to include a non-visible digital SynthID watermark
pull down to refresh
related posts
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 19h
I love the self-restraint on this. But what about everything else? What about the photoshop "scandals"? In the end, I don't think that watermarking is the solution, but for the time being it may help more than hurt.
reply
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @carter OP 19h
I think that we are going to see cryptography put into cameras... they are going to have their own keys signed by the factory with a chain that can be verified PKI kinda thing. If it has wifi it will make a merkle tree of its pictures and post the root hash to open timestamps so it can verify what all the pictures are that existed and cryptographically attest to their authenticity
reply
35 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 19h
Oof! You're probably right. I'm also sure that if they only get a whiff of the possibilities of this, bureaucrats will turn this into a surveillance nightmare!!! So, perhaps running an unlicensed AI to recreate a new version of my photo before I distribute it would be a good privacy tool!
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @carter OP 18h
it would be a dream you could prove for certain some video hapend when and where they said it did
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 18h
True. But please not for my feet pics I sell for sats. I don't want my stalkers to know where I am.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter OP 17h
I think I know what my weekend project is gonna be... Sats4Soles
reply on another page