pull down to refresh
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 10h \ parent \ on: OpenAIs new model "o3" achieves amazing scores in benchmarks tech
Scary that just 1 month ago, after evaluating o1, the great Terrence Tao-
anticipated that the benchmark would "resist AIs for several years at least," noting that the problems require substantial domain expertise and that we currently lack sufficient relevant training data.
(https://arxiv.org/html/2411.04872v1)
Our new tiktok attention spans won't tolerate these super long 80 game seasons.
You used to be able to easily watch games on TV - now they want to monetize everything, which is great revenue in the short term but will kill their funnel for new fans.
Honestly ever since her insane March Madness runs I've found Caitlin Clark and the Fever much more compelling to watch.
Great point haha. comparing USD-EUR and CAD-EUR it does look like dollar is strengthening against both CAD weakening relative to the EURO
Ben has always been extremely articulate- probably one of the most articulate MMA fighters and that's why he got under Jorge Masvidal's skin so well (until he got infamously knee KO'd). His appearances on DC's podcast are great- they have great chemistry as former wrestling greats.
He was a big litecoin proponent back in the day but he has been preaching BTC only lately. Will give this a listen even though he's stumbled IMO explaining bitcoin to his MMA colleagues.
Would never get into a car that didn't match the App details.
This is why Waymo will win eventually...
28 days is one of my favorite movies... definitely my fav zombie movie. Didnt realize they were making this... Danny Boyle and Cilian Murphy back this is going to be a must see for sure.
I literally spent 90 minutes on the phone yesterday (mostly on hold) with an insurance company trying to get a peer to peer approved for a patient to get rehab (with no resolution). I wanted to kill someone but this is a little much...
Well as I said the first comp package I think everyone laughed initially and didn't take seriously, so lawyers could later poke holes in it by saying that due diligence in line with other public companies was not demonstrated.
This 2nd time around the value of the comp package is well known and they voted again to give it to him- so I don't know how this judge could rule against it but IANAL.
Why not consider capping the hype or other deal structures, in order to demonstrate due diligence to shareholders? He already makes a shit-ton of money on the stock growth because he already owns an immense amount of shares- which should bring him enough motivate him to succeed. $50 billion (now way higher) is unheard of.. what's the next highest stock comp in the tech industry? Would not upside up until $10 billion not be sufficient to motivate a CEO? Did they discuss giving him a guaranteed salary in return for an upside cap? It seemed there's a process the board is supposed to go through for public companies that was not followed (my 4th hand knowledge from a long forgotten podcast haha).
IANAL but to me when I hear horror stories about divorce court settlements and other crazy contract low stories it's not too surprising that the initial ruling on the comp package was made.
I can actually understand the first ruling. I remember listening to a podcast which explained that as a public company, there is a specific process public companies must go through in coming up with compensation packages that shows they are acting in their shareholders' best interest:
- No conflict of interest on the board
- Demonstrate due diligence exploring packages in line with similar industry standards.
Ie how did they come up with the numbers they did? Who is to say 1/2 of 1/3 the number of shares would not have incentivized Elon who is already incentivized by owning a large percentage of Tesla shares. Did they even discuss capping the upside? Or did they just go along with Elon's first proposal...
That being said how can you throw out the compensation after a second vote where voting shareholders now all have their eyes wide open...
The $345 million seems 1000x more egregious though... how in the hell do the courts even justify that without some sort of cap...