pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @creativityisoverrated 18 Dec \ parent \ on: Let’s Learn Japanese with Sensei: おすすめ ideasfromtheedge
Does that translate as “weird”?
That’s fake news: https://x.com/larsmoravy/status/1860100416819855492?s=46
Stats are based on wrong data.
IMHO it depends.
If it will end up just as store of value, Bitcoiners won’t be so much different than “Golders”.
In short:
- Elon: nah. Tesla still owns BTC, and probably when (hopefully) all of this greenish FUD will end, things will return to normal. Will remain a partial shitcoiner? Probably yes, but not a big deal.
- Dorsey: not a fan, did a lot of mistakes. Does he have this type of influence? No, not now nor in the future.
- Blackrock: we’re talking about of a big player that could change the world faith, so yes.
So Britains owns more or less than 0,3% of the total BTC supply (~21mil).
Labour will sell them to finance their socialists idea: that makes totally sense to me. One step closer to bankruptcy.
Is there an easy way or article that explains how tokens are issued? Maybe it’s a stupid question but I couldn’t help.
I understand that there isn’t a multisig peg-in/peg-out system and Sequentia is a “slavechain”, but I don’t understand this alternative method.