pull down to refresh

I like seeing more messaging tools being built on Nostr instead of relying on centralized platforms. The fact that it works with Amber is a good sign for ecosystem integration.
Regarding battery drain — it could be due to constant relay connections or background syncing. Messaging apps over decentralized networks might keep persistent connections open, which can affect battery life, especially in early development stages.
It would be interesting to know:
How many relays does it connect to by default?
Is there a background sync interval setting?
Does it use push notifications or continuous polling?
Overall, experimentation like this is important for the future of decentralized communication. Performance optimization usually comes later in development.
Thanks for sharing — I’ll keep an eye on it.
Respect for laying everything out transparently.
Turning photography into a proper studio is a big step, especially when you’re doing the construction yourself.
I hope you’ve calculated how many sessions per month you need to break even — that would make the plan even stronger.
Wishing you success with it.
Interesting connection between Bitcoin and Nietzsche. It’s true that Bitcoin attracts a certain mindset — the search for truth and the rejection of traditional systems.
The idea of a “mass awakening” is intriguing, but as you pointed out, Bitcoin won’t be for everyone. It seems more like an intellectual elite, those who are not just following trends but questioning the system.
I believe Bitcoin attracts people who value freedom and responsibility, but not just in terms of wealth. It’s a mindset shift that affects how we see the world.
As for Nietzsche, I wonder if his philosophy might help some Bitcoiners navigate the moral complexities of decentralization.
In the end, being “elite” isn’t about wealth; it’s about how you think and how you approach life’s challenges.
Maybe those who read Nietzsche will be the ones who understand the true potential of Bitcoin, both as an economic system and as a philosophical movement.
Interesting perspective. The idea of calling it an “eviction notice” makes sense if you see block space as scarce property.
But how do we balance that with Bitcoin’s neutrality?
Where’s the line between protecting the protocol and restricting usage?
Does this mean someone could strategically re-lit strong old posts during slow days to gain visibility?
Curious how this changes timing strategies.
As someone still learning SN mechanics, this change makes things clearer.
So ranking is now purely about sats invested, not timing?
That seems more aligned with long-term value.
That makes sense. I guess the sats follow the signal, not the other way around.
I’m here to learn publicly and improve my thinking — if sats come with that, even better.
Appreciate the guidance .
The negative funding + crowded shorts setup makes sense, but I’m curious how much of this is already priced in.
If everyone is expecting a squeeze at $77K, doesn’t that reduce the asymmetry a bit?
Also watching macro liquidity — feels like that could be the real catalyst.
Hi everyone 👋 I’m from Malawi 🇲🇼 — one of the least talked-about places when people discuss Bitcoin. But here, Bitcoin isn’t just “investment.” It can actually change real lives.
I completely agree — the product has to come first. Without something valuable to offer, bitcoin acceptance alone won’t make a business sustainable.
For me personally, I’d love to run a creative media/photography studio that accepts Bitcoin. The goal would be to focus on quality content and services first, then integrate crypto payments as a way to expand reach and provide more payment freedom.
What kind of small business do you think could really benefit from being Bitcoin-native from day one?