0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 28m \ parent \ on: Sensei Stacked 900k Sats on Stacker News BooksAndArticles
Oh, good one.
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @Fabs 34m \ parent \ on: Sensei Stacked 900k Sats on Stacker News BooksAndArticles
The first 10 - 20k are the best in my experience.
"I don’t think articles in this territory must necessarily be technical ones"
It's the whole point of this territory to ask questions about Bitcoin, or post (technical) stuff about Bitcoin.
You're making up vague reasons why you're Gucci with posting things like your prize-winner on this territory to cover up your main intention---to collect the sat rewards from siggy, and that's not the intention behind his actions.
I think you're doing quite well zaps-wise, leave those sats for those that actually keep in line with the territory's theme.
But hey, looks like songs about Bitcoin are also Gucci, maybe I'm the problem. 🤷
On a side note: I didn't post anything, thus it's not that I'm coming from a sour-temper tantrum because I didn't make it into the top five; its simply that I don't think that stuff like that belongs in this territory.
Seriously: what has "*Are you giving off "Main Character" Energy? to do with this territory?
To me it looks like he simply wanted to collect the Sats, and that's wrong. @cryotosensei.
I'll not enter in the endless discussion that may follow from that, I will say, however, that the countless shitcoin's that are "easier to transact on" are nowhere near as popular as Bitcoin, and how many of those have seen their use increase over the last decade? How many haven't?
I wonder why.
let's circle back onto the topic and get it over with quickly:
"In an attestation signed by BDO, an independent accounting network, the company announced record-breaking profits of $4.52 billion, as part of its stablecoin-derived operations."
"Tether specified that $1 billion was obtained directly from operations including U.S. Treasuries, while the rest was obtained from the appreciation of the company’s investments in gold and bitcoin."
Ah, more than 3/4 of those profits stem from speculation and / or owning assets such as gold or Bitcoin.
What point are you trying to make here? That they too profit from Bitcoin's price appreciation?
Why would stablecoins from a private company be the "future" of payments, when the Fed, ECB et cetera can simply throw up their very own "Stable coin", commonly referred to as CBDC's?!
I don't know why you're constantly trying to create some vague points against Bitcoin, you'd do better investing that time into actually reading up about Bitcoin, instead of some goofy articles.
That's why we can't have nice stuff, people: some individual with enough money will come along and ruin it all for a chance to bump up his own ego.