pull down to refresh
@DarthCoin
28 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 18h \ on: Sovereignty Requires Privacy: lessons from the fall of Samourai Wallet bitcoin
LOL people will never learn the lesson, nor have idea what really is sovereignty and privacy.
Why?
Samourai was a failed trap. Get over it.
Your rudeness was even worse just because you compared me with that garbage.
Only that I am not a snowflake to affect me these kind of bad cheap jokes.
You are wrong and brainwashed by their stupid propaganda.
That crap movie have nothing to do with sovereignty.
Just because you made this post and "compare" it with me / my teachings show that their propaganda worked (in the wrong way). You fall for their trap without using your brain.
yeah is even better when are masks from random people (not famous).... crowd disguise is the best way to hide
I sold all my Bitcoin last year and it was one of the greatest decision I have ever made because it was Bitcoin bought not Bitcoin earned
That's stupid.
not your server = not your data.
In the moment you put some data on somebody else server, is not your data anymore.
Even small channels make a big difference
Nope. If you want your public node to be a good one for its users as "uncle Jim", you must have good peers and channels. A small channel will be depleted instantly and will became obsolete, a burden for your node.
LN is not like a Facebook to open channels with random people just for fun. LN is totally an economic network based on efficient routes supported by fees and liquidity. Think about it as a "capital flow" through some pipes.
I see you have only 2 channels bigger than 3M sats. For a public routing node that is really low. All the rest of the channels are useless.
Do not "expose" publicly your public node to all kind of trash "balcony" and "jungle" nodes. Those will make your success payment rate to go so low that you can't even use that node. Avoid at any cost Tor only public nodes, those are doing more damage than good for a public routing node.
CHOOSE WISELY YOUR PEERS! You want to offer good payment routes not just an unusable public node.
- open from your side a well sized channel with some good LSPs. Always bigger than 3M sats. For less than 3M sats should be private channels not public.
- buy some inbound channels from well known good LSPs
- constantly maintain good channels if your users number grows.
You have been warned.
and 90% of those txs are made by BTC sessions with his tutorials LOL
Liquid is not a L2... is a sidechain.
Liquid was a good intention back into his inception. It was coming up early in the block size wars as a proposal for exchanges, to have some kind of interoperable network to move funds between them, faster and cheaper than BTC onchain, but still using BTC.
I kinda agree with that use case. A federation that is moving funds privately between them.
But then LN was launched and come in force and Liquid kinda lost the use case.
The block size war was also over, segwit in place and onchain mempool liberated, so even the exchanges that were excited about Liquid, they were still preferring to do it over onchain as usual.
LN got more and more grip and Liquid was slowly forgotten and became useless.
Now Blockstream, want to push people into using it as it would be a "cheapest and fastest" way instead of LN, because they do not want to see it terminated (as nobody is using it). In the end they put a lot of effort and money to build it.
Right now is just a massive marketing push by Blockstream to be used this LBTC crap.
IMHO they should go back to the original idea to be used for private entities and not pushed to large masses of users.
Now all those onchain maxis want to use Liquid instead of preparing in time, with calm new LN channels. That's why this crazy mania with Liquid. But as usual when the onchain fees are going down, Liquid use is going to meaningless until zero.
A TLDR:
