pull down to refresh

I ended with almost exactly the same amount of BTC I started with, although it "magically" turned into non-KYC BTC - woohoo!

Interesting story. I'm still pretty skeptical of this renting hash business. But maybe it can be different than cloud mining. I'd love to read a good write up of the trade offs between renting hash and running your own.

reply
106 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 21h
renting hash business.

scam
renting hash = paying hashers...

reply
non-KYC BTC

The most idiotic thing to say...
There's no such thing as "non-KYC BTC". If that will ever exist, then Bitcoin is dead.

reply

Would you accept "BTC for which there are fewer records that link it to my identity" ?

reply

As long there's only one chain for bitcoin, yes.
KYC is bad for giving away your identity, it have nothing to do with how I use my own sats.

As I said many times:

Gov have NONE authority over my BTC.
But a bad guy getting my KYC data from a data broker can do much damage with that info, than a gov knowing a meaningless BTC address I used...
This is where many people are wrong, they focus too much on how a gov "knows" what they acquired from an exchange or whatever source.

reply
I ended with almost exactly the same amount of BTC I started with

Emphasis on almost. Doesn't seem worth it to me.

reply