pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tuma OP 21 Aug \ parent \ on: Inside Bitcoin Code ~ IBC#015 bitcoin
Thank you 🙏🏻
Interesting take.
Honestly, I think they are a bit over-engineering things. The solutions adopted seem good, but it looks like they are looking for the best possible development, instead for the solution that just works.
Which could be great, but may lack adoption in the long run..
I agree with the swap provider being a possible single point of failure. More so, since Boltz is enforcing OFAC blacklisting.
My two sats:
A private company doesn’t owe anyone anything. If they want to push another project is their legitimate right to do so.
However, if the market pushes for keeping a discontinued product it could be in the company’s best interest to continue updating it.
Thank you for your shutouts, it really helps Insider Editions to grow. I suggest to also have an official account here, let’s see!