That’s very interesting!

Honestly, sats tracker was born as an offline expense tracker, like a simple excel file but nicer.

This could be another interesting project to make, I’ll have to think it through :)

Thanks for sharing!

Btw, no lightning talks because there will be a dedicated lightning conference in Berlin in October!

Ups, my bad. I usually don’t make this rookie mistake 😂

Thanks, I appreciate it 🙏🏻

Thanks! I appreciate any feedback, if you encounter any bug or problem feel free to file an issue on GitHub :)

Thank you, I really appreciate it :)

Thank you 🙏🏻

Interesting take.

Honestly, I think they are a bit over-engineering things. The solutions adopted seem good, but it looks like they are looking for the best possible development, instead for the solution that just works.

Which could be great, but may lack adoption in the long run..

I agree with the swap provider being a possible single point of failure. More so, since Boltz is enforcing OFAC blacklisting.

My two sats:

A private company doesn’t owe anyone anything. If they want to push another project is their legitimate right to do so.

However, if the market pushes for keeping a discontinued product it could be in the company’s best interest to continue updating it.