wtf is GME?

This is my thought process as well. Curious what others think of this strategy.

Technically yes. See this is why I posted this question here. To get to the bottom of this. Thank you for taking the time to help me :)

That link is working for me now and I agree with you. Seems like he's overcounting Dtap. How the hell is he getting 15 total doses for Dtap?!

EDIT: Ohhh now I get what he's doing. He's counting a vaccine that is considered "three in one" as three. So then if Dtap has five doses but he considers it three separate vaccines in one, then that's how he gets 15.

Hmm, not sure how you're getting 57 from CDC. I can't get anywhere near that.

EDIT: Just counted again and if you count flu vaccine once per year for 18 years, the dengue one which is only recommended for places where dengue is prevalent, and the COVID shots with boosters then I get close to 57. Still nowhere near 69.

Did you get 57 by going to the cited CDC vaccine schedule site or by going to RFK's own site (childrenshealthdefense)? Because the former is what the book cites and what should be used to verify the count. The latter could very well be wrong since RFK himself seems to be inflating the number. In the book he states 69 and in recent interviews he's now saying 72.

That pleb used the numbers in RFK's own website (childrenshealthdefence.org), not the CDC vaccine schedule as cited in RFK's book. In other words, even RFK's own website does not say 69 nor does it say the 72 he has recently started using as the new number and even if it did say it, the website you should be looking at and counting from is the CDC vaccine schedule site which has nowhere near 69.

So it's not "moral panic" (whatever that means), it's math.

Nevermind. Found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJd6RKsY5H4

If he lies about something as simple and easy to look up and fact check as number of doses in vaccine schedule, how are you to believe other things he states that are not as simple or easy to fact check? It's a matter of credibility and he's losing it by stating incorrect numbers.

What number do you get when you add them up? If someone wants to debate facts, then present facts. The worst thing you can do when trying to be a credible source of information is provide incorrect information (in this case, incorrect numbers).

I have added them up. He's not close and recently he debated and said 72!

That link is down for me.

Problem with his heart being in the right place but lying or misrepresenting numbers means you can't take anything he says as fact. It undermines his credibility. Very unfortunate since he could have said the correct number and still had the same effect.

No. You have to manually add up the doses using the CDC Vaccine schedule table.

Even if you add those 18, you still don’t get 69. What number are you getting? Maybe I’m counting wrong.

Yeah I want to believe him based on my own personal experiences but if right from the get go (introduction pages) he’s printing falsehoods, then I can’t continue reading or believing.

Not sure where you got 70 from. He says 69 repeatedly and his citation for it is CDC Vaccine schedule which by my count is 30ish

Even giving him the benefit of the doubt that it does, still doesn’t get to 69.

He says “doses”. If I count all doses on cdc schedule I get somewhere around ~30

His citation is the CDC government so even if what you’re saying is true, that is not what he’s referring to. He’s referring to CDC vaccine schedule.

Thank you for the bounty. It's the one book I always pull out of my library every few years to reread because the book's words have different meanings as you age and life changes. Enjoy!