pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 6 replies \ @satoshisat OP 29 Jun 2023 \ parent \ on: Has anyone read "The Real Anthony Fauci"? I've got a question. bitcoin
I have added them up. He's not close and recently he debated and said 72!
If you want to load your kids up with adjuvant, be my guest, just don't pretend there is any science there.
reply
What number do you get when you add them up? If someone wants to debate facts, then present facts. The worst thing you can do when trying to be a credible source of information is provide incorrect information (in this case, incorrect numbers).
reply
Is it as bad as fixating on a single gotcha as opposed to engaging his actual argument? #npc
reply
If he lies about something as simple and easy to look up and fact check as number of doses in vaccine schedule, how are you to believe other things he states that are not as simple or easy to fact check? It's a matter of credibility and he's losing it by stating incorrect numbers.
reply
One of the plebs in this thread counted 57 without doing much leg work. This false moral panic isn't fooling anyone.
reply
That pleb used the numbers in RFK's own website (childrenshealthdefence.org), not the CDC vaccine schedule as cited in RFK's book. In other words, even RFK's own website does not say 69 nor does it say the 72 he has recently started using as the new number and even if it did say it, the website you should be looking at and counting from is the CDC vaccine schedule site which has nowhere near 69.
So it's not "moral panic" (whatever that means), it's math.
reply