Can't be cracked, not in a miilion years, that's the point.

Not really

No you didn't, that's my point.

Hey, good point, the people who increased the Op_Return limit are not Core devs neither. You're funny

Well, we will come back to this when they start pushing it in.

Jameson Lopp is one of the most influencial core devs, he is the author.

Reposting an article on what Core is doing is not "engagement farming". Labelling people "anti-core" is not an address to the core issue here, it says it right in the proposal "Funds will be frozen if not upgraded " I am not exaggerating https://github.com/jlopp/bips/blob/quantum_migration/bip-post-quantum-migration.mediawiki This is totalitarianism stuff. Satoshi coins should be able to stay untouched for the next 1000 years if they wish we don't need core devs to freeze them.

Nothing, let the owner move his coins if they feel like there is a threat. Quantum is not even close to be a real threat to Bitcoin. Practically impossible to guess those private keys. Next they will come for everyone else's coin with a much faker threat.

Sounds a lot like Ethereum to me

No matter what it's a really bad idea to mess with someone else's property. Who gives core the right to freeze others coins? What are they going to do next, reverse the chain? The point is, anything happens on Bitcoin should be opt-in otherwise it's a violation of property rights. Quantum is not even a real threat compared to this and it's negative effects on Bitcoin. If you think your coins are at risk of quantum you should move your coins not someone else's

Yes you're right but, I am not talking about people paying with bitcoin. I am talking about parents buying bitcoin for their kids with the money the kids make selling things people want.