pull down to refresh
@piecoverBTC
107,445 sats stacked
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @piecoverBTC OP 1h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Core Now Want To Freeze Satoshi Coins In Pretext Of Quantum Computing bitcoin
Can't be cracked, not in a miilion years, that's the point.
Hey, good point, the people who increased the Op_Return limit are not Core devs neither. You're funny
Reposting an article on what Core is doing is not "engagement farming".
Labelling people "anti-core" is not an address to the core issue here, it says it right in the proposal "Funds will be frozen if not upgraded " I am not exaggerating
https://github.com/jlopp/bips/blob/quantum_migration/bip-post-quantum-migration.mediawiki
This is totalitarianism stuff. Satoshi coins should be able to stay untouched for the next 1000 years if they wish we don't need core devs to freeze them.
Nothing, let the owner move his coins if they feel like there is a threat. Quantum is not even close to be a real threat to Bitcoin.
Practically impossible to guess those private keys.
Next they will come for everyone else's coin with a much faker threat.
No matter what it's a really bad idea to mess with someone else's property. Who gives core the right to freeze others coins? What are they going to do next, reverse the chain?
The point is, anything happens on Bitcoin should be opt-in otherwise it's a violation of property rights.
Quantum is not even a real threat compared to this and it's negative effects on Bitcoin.
If you think your coins are at risk of quantum you should move your coins not someone else's
Yes you're right but, I am not talking about people paying with bitcoin. I am talking about parents buying bitcoin for their kids with the money the kids make selling things people want.