pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @kruw 7 Oct \ parent \ on: What “obvious” Bitcoin product hasn’t been built yet? AskSN
This idea sounds like Liana wallet. The "trigger" is reset by spending your coins on chain.
There's only 2 more details I would mention:
- Make sure that you do not share the xpub address of your cold storage wallet with third party servers; run your own node
- When transferring between your own wallets, try to send entire UTXOs without creating a leftover change output
I think this film is really overrated, but Nicholson's talented acting makes it entertaining.
There's a sequel called "Doctor Sleep" that's basically the same style as a superhero movie.
Good plan. Make sure you write down your passphrase for Wasabi Wallet, it acts the "13th word" of your recovery seed.
Link without the tracker tag attached: https://www.youtube.com/live/DWHLag_Ur7M
Link without the tracker tag attached: https://www.youtube.com/live/7UH9o6SZPhc
Question for you: if people want to pay a miner to validate a transaction ... of 90kb today, how would they do it?
The way you pay miners a transaction fee is by having the value of outputs be lower than the value of the inputs you are spending.
Would other miners reject that block?
Unlikely, unless they mined a competing block at the exact same time.
If miners all adopt the default OP_RETURN limit today, why?
Miners adopted a higher OP_RETURN limit because they wanted to satisfy their paying customers.
Wouldn't miners be influenced by market signals?
Yes, the miners are highly influenced by their customers who are paying them to store their data on your Knots node.
I don't think moral purity is a good reason to fork bitcoin right now, but I do think it's a good reason to try to influence what blocks make me longest chain in future.
Without a fork, how can you influence what blocks are in the longest chain?
I would attempt to ensure that whichever miner validated the block incurs some reputational or financial penalty.
That's exactly what Bitcoin Purifier does: It financially penalizes any miner that creates a block containing spam by rejecting it.
So it's your MORAL RESPONSIBILITY to stop running Knots and start running Pure.
if I didn't relay it then it's not my responsibility.
Regulations against CSAM punish the consumer of the content, not just the distributor.
I don't have a problem with validated transactions though.
Why don't you have a problem with CSAM after your node downloads and validates it?
You're wrong, you have to run Bitcoin Pure to fork the blockchain. Knots syncs to the same chain as Core, so your node will download the exact same data.
That was a rhetorical response
It's not rhetorical at all. Forking is the exact solution to the problem you are whining about.
Yes you are, here's the conclusion of your original post:
Maybe you should fork off with your pedo coin and leave us with our theocratic authoritarian coin?
So if you aren't running the pure version of Bitcoin right now, then you are GUILTY!
What if you want to inhibit ... content ...?
If you want to inhibit content, you have to fork the blockchain.
What part of my social contract with this censorship resistant monetary network makes stipulated that if I want to run a node with a very low OP_RETURN limit to inhibit complete (not fragments) content of any sort of media format from getting mined then I am to be classified as a theocratic authoritarian?
That part is called "the consensus rules"
If this is true then why isn't Iran's revolutionary guard - who actively mines bitcoin using state resources - running millions of relaying nodes today to overwhelm the network and censor bitcoin? This crude sybil attack is not as difficult as a 51% attack, and far more sustainable.
Bitcoin Core maps providers to make sure your node has a diverse set of peers in order to prevent this sort of attack.
Maybe you should fork off with your pedo coin and leave us with our theocratic authoritarian coin?
I agree, here's the software you need to run for your fork: https://github.com/rot13maxi/bitcoin-purifier